MedPath

The Clinical Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Conditions
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Registration Number
NCT03984474
Lead Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Brief Summary

Retrospective cohort study. The investigators evaluated the early, middle and long term effects of different surgical methods of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee function.

In the evaluation, the investigators focused on the differences between different age groups, different genders and different basic motor states, the differences between early reconstruction and non-early reconstruction, and the differences in clinical outcomes of different surgical methods.

Detailed Description

Age 13-65 included. Only include isolated anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) rupture. Excluded revision surgery. Excluded bilateral ACL rupture. Excluded the contralateral ACL tear after surgery. 40 patients at least in each group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

diagnosis of isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

combined other ligament damage combined intraarticular injuries

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) scorean average of 20 year

The entire IKDC form, which includes a demographic form, current health assessment form, subjective knee evaluation form, knee history form, surgical documentation form, and knee examination form, may be used as separate forms. The knee history form and surgical documentation form are provided for convenience. All researchers are required to complete the subjective knee evaluation and knee examination form. Instructions for scoring the subjective knee evaluation form and the knee examination form are provided on the back of the forms. Total score 100, ≥75 being considered excellent.

KT-2000 testan average of 20 year

It is a kind of joint measuring instrument used to determine the anteroposterior stability of knee joint. The contrast between the uninjured side and the surgical measurement showed that the difference of ≤3mm was considered excellent.

Magnatic Resonance Imaging evaluationan average of 20 year

All patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction underwent MRI imaging evaluation of both knees. Use International Cartilage Repair Society(ICRS) score to evaluate, total score is 12, classified into four grades,grade Ⅰ: normal (12), grade Ⅱ: nearly normal (8-11), grade Ⅲ: abnormal (4-7), grade Ⅳ: severely abnormal (1-3).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Skeletal force line and various angles by X-ray evaluationan average of 20 year

X-ray was used to evaluate the skeletal force line and various angles of patients. Use Qvadriceps Angle to evaluate quadriceps force line and patellar ligament force line. The normal Angle is 18-22° for the adult standing position.Above or below this range is considered abnormal.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Peking University Third Hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath