MedPath

Assessment of the Safety and Performance of Elbow Supports in the Context of Epicondylitis or a Return to Sport After Sprain

Recruiting
Conditions
Elbow Sprain
Epicondylitis
Interventions
Device: Elbow MID 500
Other: Control group Elbow STRAP
Other: Control group Elbow MID 500
Device: Elbow STRAP
Registration Number
NCT05552209
Lead Sponsor
Decathlon SE
Brief Summary

Decathlon has developed elbowMID500 and elbowSTRAP products which are medical devices that must be positioned around the elbow during sport practice, in order to limit symptoms related to epicondylitis or previous sprains (elbowMID500 only).

The objective of this multicentre study is to collect data on the related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Decathlon elbowMID500 and elbowSTRAP products to demonstrate safety and performance of these devices in a real-world setting.

Outcome data collected from this study will provide the basis for Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) reporting, Clinical Study Report (CSR), Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) on Decathlon elbowMID500 and elbowSTRAP devices and support peer-reviewed publications on products performance and safety.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject is aged ≥ 18 years old
  • Subject has an acute epicondylitis (stage 1 or 2) OR a recent mild elbow sprain
  • Subject performs regular physical activity (minimum of 2 sessions of 10 minutes per week)
  • The current condition of his/her elbow allows the subject to resume usual physical activity
  • Subject has been informed and is willing to sign an informed consent form
  • Subject is willing to comply with protocol requirements and return to the study center for all clinical evaluations and required follow-up (6 weeks)
  • Subject is affiliated to the French social security regime
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subject has conditions that may interfere with his/her ability to understand protocol requirements, participate in scheduled visits, or provide his/her informed consent
  • Subject has worn a support (elbow brace or articulated orthosis) in the last month during his/her sport practice
  • Subject has resumed regular physical activity since his/her recent injury
  • Subject has any medical condition that could impact the study at investigator's discretion
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity or allergy to the components of the device (polyamide, elastane, polyester, elastodiene) • Adult subject to legal protection measure

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Orthosis group 1Elbow MID 500Use of Elbow Mid 500 device during sport practice
Control group 2Control group Elbow STRAPControl group of the Elbow Strap group - no medical device used during sport practice
Control group 1Control group Elbow MID 500Control group of the Elbow Mid 500 group - no medical device used during sport practice
Orthosis group 2Elbow STRAPUse of Elbow Strap device during sport practice
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional scoreChange from Baseline functionnal score at 6 weeks

Comparison of the Japanese Elbow Assessment Score System (JOA elbow scale from 0=worst ouctome to 100=best outcome) between the baseline and last follow-up visit in each group (orthosis vs control), for each device model.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety (adverse events)6 weeks of follow-up

Comparison of adverse events rates between the groups (orthosis vs control), for each device model

Confidence level (confidence questionnaire related to physical activity)Change from Baseline confidence level at 6 weeks

Gap in the confidence level related to physical activity (scale from 0=worst outcome to 100=best outcome), between the baseline and last follow-up visit in each group (orthosis vs control), for each device model

Elbow painChange from Baseline elbow pain at 6 weeks

Comparison of elbow pain, assessed through a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0=best outcome to 10=worst outcome, between the groups (orthosis vs control), for each device model

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Cabinet de kinésithérapie du Belvédère

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Centre Hospitalier de Boulogne sur Mer

🇫🇷

Boulogne-sur-Mer, France

Centre de rééducation et de balnéothérapie Kinés Faches

🇫🇷

Faches-Thumesnil, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille

🇫🇷

Lille, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath