One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Using FDI Criteria in Comparison to Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 69
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- clinical performance and durability of restoration
Study Overview
Brief Summary
restoring posterior teeth by bulk fll and nanofill composite and clinical evaluation of performance and durability of both restorations during one year follow up
Detailed Description
The treated cavities will be divided into 2 groups, cavities will be incrementally layered with resin composite and each increment will be cured as directed by the manufacturer with the light curing unit (XL 3000; 3M/eSPe), with an energy higher than 450 mW/cm² (±50 mw/cm²) and other group of cavities will be restored by bulk fill composite (3M ESPE) as one increment then will be cured as directed by the manufacturer with the light curing unit.
Articulation will be checked carefully with an articulating paper and occlusal adjustments will be performed using flame shaped carbide and diamond finishing burs (DENTSPLY) using water spray, restorations will be finished occlusally with finishing burs and finally polished with aluminium oxide polishing paste and a rubber cup (DENTSPLY).
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 38 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Good oral hygiene.Patients must show no signs of orofacial pain. The presence of molar teeth requiring composite restorations for the treatment of primary carious lesions
Exclusion Criteria
- •Teeth with abnormal periapical anatomy or caries that will be likely to result in very deep restorations. Teeth with old restorations or severely destructed dental crowns.Tempro-mandibular joint problems involving symptomatic pain.Pregnancy or breast feeding, acute and chronic systemic diseases, immune-compromised patients
Arms & Interventions
Bulk full composite (3M)
bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities
Intervention: bulk fill composite (Other)
Bulk full composite (3M)
bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities
Intervention: Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) (Other)
Incremental packing composite resin
Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) restoration in class one cavities
Intervention: bulk fill composite (Other)
Incremental packing composite resin
Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) restoration in class one cavities
Intervention: Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
clinical performance and durability of restoration
Time Frame: one year
Outcome measure is Clinical performance and durability of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI criteria , Unit of measurement is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically excellent, or good, or sufficient, or unsatisfactory, or clinically poor.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Mary Sabry Tawfik Tadros
researcher
Cairo University
