In Patients With Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain, do Lumbar Inter-vertebral Motion Variables Change Following a Course of Manual Therapy: A Feasibility Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Mechanical
- Sponsor
- Bournemouth University
- Enrollment
- 16
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Ratio of patients approached vs. number of participants who consent to trial
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial to explore if there is a change in intervertebral movement following a course of manual therapy in patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).
Research Questions:
- In patients with acute NSLBP, does lumbar intervertebral movement change following a course of manual therapy?
- In patients with acute NSLBP, do those who respond to manual therapy (established by patient reported outcomes measures) have different intervertebral movement to those who do not?
Detailed Description
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a leading cause of disability and work-days lost worldwide. Yet, in most cases we do not know the specific cause. It is thought to be due to abnormal movement between the spinal bones (vertebrae). The investigators can now measure movement between vertebrae using low-dose quantitative fluoroscopy (QF), or motion x-ray videos. QF is a reliable method of measuring spinal movement which is non-invasive and does not expose the patient to a lot of radiation. In this study, QF will be used as a measuring tool to measure spinal movement in patients with acute NSLBP before manual therapy versus after manual therapy to explore if there is a change in spinal movement. Research suggests that some patients respond to manual therapy and some do not, a secondary question in this study is to explore if there are differences in spinal movement between those who respond to manual therapy (measured using pain and disability questionnaires) and those who do not. This study is a feasibility study to determine whether the study can be carried out as a full-scale trial. Participants will be recruited from the AECC University College (AECC UC) Clinic. Following an examination, patients with acute low back pain, and who are eligible for the study will be invited to join. Participants will proceed with initial measurements which include validated questionnaires and QF. Following these measurements participants will be randomised into two groups, each containing 15 participants. Both groups will receive an evidence-informed home management booklet, the manual therapy group will receive five manual therapy treatments in two weeks. Participants will return for follow-up measurements two weeks after baseline measurements.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), without leg pain, of at least 2 weeks duration, but no more than 4 weeks duration
- •Patients between the ages of 18 and 65
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who cannot understand written English and unable to provide full informed consent.
- •Patients who are currently involved in another research study
- •Patients with a BMI over 30 (less likely to obtain the required information from the images)
- •Pregnancy or potentially pregnant
- •Previous ionising radiation exposure within the last 6 months greater than 8mSv.
- •Previous lumbar spine surgery, as well as recent abdominal or pelvic surgery (within the last 12 months).
- •Scoliosis or positive Adams forward Bending Test for Scoliosis.
- •Diagnosed Osteoporosis (Bone Density Scan)
- •Patients with a numeric pain scale of 8 or more, or 2 or less, taken at the New Patient Examination Appointment.
- •Manual therapy already received for this episode of NSLBP
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Ratio of patients approached vs. number of participants who consent to trial
Time Frame: 1 year
Rate of conversion from number of patients approached (who are eligible for the trial) to number of participants who consent to be a part of the trial.
Incidence of participant being withdrawn
Time Frame: 1 year
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who have been withdraw from the trial (where the practitioner withdraws the participant from the trial)
Ratio of presenting patients and eligible patients
Time Frame: 1 year
Ratio of the number of patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain vs. number of eligible patients (according to eligibility criteria)
Incidence of participant withdrawal
Time Frame: 1 year
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who withdraw from the trial (where the participant withdraws from the trial)
Number of participants who experienced adverse or serious adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
Ratio of total number of participants (in both groups) vs. serious adverse events, as well as adverse events.
Participant compliance in arm two
Time Frame: 1 year
Ratio of total participants in arm two vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm two)
Participant compliance in arm one
Time Frame: 1 year
Ratio of total participants in arm one vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm one)
Secondary Outcomes
- Laxity(2 weeks)
- Anterior disc height(2 weeks)
- Bournemouth Questionnaire(2 weeks)
- Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24(2 weeks)
- Inter-vertebral range of angular motion(2 weeks)
- Sagittal translation(2 weeks)
- Motion Sharing Variability (MSV)(2 weeks)
- Motion Sharing Inequality (MSI)(2 weeks)