跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/12/077693
CTRI/2024/12/077693已完成不适用

Comparison between outcomes of the conventional dorsal slit technique vs the sleeve technique for circumcision-A Randomised Control Trial.

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Research1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2025年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
52
试验地点
1
主要终点
outcomes of both techniques will be compared for operative time, introperative bleeding ,post operative pain ,requirement of analgesia ,post operative infection.

研究概览

简要总结

Circumcision is a widely performed surgical procedure with significant cultural, religious, and medical implications. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two common circumcision techniques: the conventional dorsal slit technique and the sleeve technique, in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, requirement of analgesia, and postoperative infection. This prospective randomized interventional study will be conducted at JN Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, from October 2023 to August 2025. Fifty-two patients scheduled for circumcision for various medical or religious reasons will be randomly assigned into two groups using sealed envelopes. The outcomes will be evaluated at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postoperatively. The study will provide a comprehensive assessment of the relative merits and drawbacks of each technique by systematically evaluating various parameters such as operative time, postoperative pain, and postoperative infection. The findings of this study will help in guiding surgeons to select the most appropriate circumcision technique based on patient outcomes, potentially influencing clinical practice and patient care standards.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
1.00 Day(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
Male

入选标准

  • 1.All patient posted for circumcision for various medical indication.
  • 2.Patient undergoing circumcisionfor religious purpose by this technique.

排除标准

  • 1.Carcinoma penis.
  • 2.hypospadiasis 3.Bleeding disorders.
  • 4.Patient not willing to participate in study.

结局指标

主要结局

outcomes of both techniques will be compared for operative time, introperative bleeding ,post operative pain ,requirement of analgesia ,post operative infection.

时间窗: assessment will be done at 1 week , 2 weeks and 6 weeks

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Research
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Prashant Taneja

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Reseach

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验