Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00250705
NCT00250705
Completed
Phase 4

Open Label Trial of Aripiprazole in the Treatment of CD in Adolescents

University of Iowa1 site in 1 country12 target enrollmentNovember 17, 2004
InterventionsAripiprazole

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Aripiprazole
Conditions
Conduct Disorder
Sponsor
University of Iowa
Enrollment
12
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The Primary Outcome Efficacy Measure: Rating of Aggression Against People and/or Property Scale (RAAPP) (Kemph et al 1993)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The proposed study will be a 6-week open label study evaluating aripiprazole in the treatment of 12 male post-pubertal adolescents (13-17 years, Tanner Stage 4) diagnosed with conduct disorder. The initial dose depending on the weight of the patient will be as follows: < 25 kg = 1 mg/d; 25-50 kg = 2 mg/d; 50-70 kg = 5 mg/d; > 70 kg = 10 mg/d (Data on File, 2003, Bristol-Myers Squibb). For the first two weeks of the study, the dose will be flexible based on response and tolerance and thereafter will remain fixed.

Detailed Description

The use of atypical antipsychotics in children began in 1992 with several small case series with clozapine. Since that time, five other atypical agents, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole have been introduced into the US market. The newer atypical agents are not associated with agranulocytosis that has limited the usefulness of clozapine. Among the atypical antipsychotics, risperidone has remained the most extensively studied in children and adolescents, for a variety of problems, including Tourette's disorder, conduct disorder, schizophrenia, aggression, and pervasive development disorder. Risperidone has been shown to be an effective treatment in many of these disorders. However, weight gain, hyperprolactinemia, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are troublesome adverse effects more commonly associated with risperidone such that the drug's utility in this aged patient population is limited. We expect that the utility of aripiprazole in treating the pediatric population will not be limited by adverse effects like the other atypical antipsychotics.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 17, 2004
End Date
March 23, 2009
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Samuel Kuperman, M.D.

Professor

University of Iowa

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male post-pubertal adolescents (13-17 years, Tanner Stage 4) diagnosed with conduct disorder.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically significant laboratory and/or ECG abnormalities
  • Pre-existing health conditions that would compromise patient safety
  • Mental retardation
  • Previous use of aripiprazole
  • Active psychosis

Arms & Interventions

Adolescent Conduct Disorder Males

All subjects were male and had a diagnosis of conduct disorder. All subjects were offered treatment with aripiprazole.

Intervention: Aripiprazole

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Primary Outcome Efficacy Measure: Rating of Aggression Against People and/or Property Scale (RAAPP) (Kemph et al 1993)

Time Frame: 6 weeks

Rating of Aggression Against People and/or Property Scale (RAAPP) (Kemph et al 1993) is a global rating scale of aggression completed by clinicians. Score given based on following severity scale with subject assigned 1 number: Intolerable behavior-frequently physically attacks others and destroys property (5); Severe-occasionally physically attacks people and destroys property (4); Moderately 21); and No aggressiveness reported (1). A minimum score of 1 is best and a maximum score of 5 is worst. There are no subscale scores.

Children's Aggression Scale-Parent Version

Time Frame: 6 weeks

CAS-P is a 33 item scale representing 5 domains of aggression: Items in a domain were computed based on two reference points. The first was based on a 5 point frequency range with "0" being best (never) and "4" (\> 10 times being) worst. These same items were then adjusted such that more severe acts would be weighted more heavily compared to less severe aggressive behaviors. Within a domain, 0 was the best score. Worst score for the various aggression domains were: Verbal 26.16, Against Objects and Animals 11.8, Provoked 15.84, Initiated 17.84, and Use of Weapons 13.16.

Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (OAS-M)

Time Frame: 6 weeks

OAS-M divides aggressions into 4 subtypes: 1) verbal aggression, 2) property aggression, 3) self aggression (autoaggression), and 4) physical aggression. Each subtype has an initial score ranging from 0 (least aggressive) to 4 (most aggressive). The score for each subscale is further weighed (multiplied) by a constant: verbal scale's constant is 1 (max adjusted score of 4); property scale's constant is 2 (max adjusted score 8); self scale's constant is 3 (max adjusted score 12); and physical scale's constant is 4 (max adjusted score of 16). Within a given scale, "0" is the best score and maximum adjusted scale score is worst.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Secondary Outcome Measures Were the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale (NIMH, 1985a).(6 weeks)
  • Secondary Outcome Measures Were the Clinical Global Impression--Improvement (CGI-I) Scales (NIMH, 1985a).(6 weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials