Demoralization Among Palliative Care Patients and Their Family Caregivers in Hong Kong: A Pilot Study
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 147
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Demoralization of patients and caregivers
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study aims to explore the prevalence of demoralization among palliative care patients and family caregivers in Hong Kong and examines psychosocial factors associated with demoralization. We hypothesized that higher depression, caregiving strain and caregiver support needs would lead to higher demoralization, and greater perceived family support was associated with lower demoralization among patients and family caregivers.
Detailed Description
Literature Review:
Demoralization in palliative care Palliative care patients (PCP) and their family caregivers are always confronted with death and dying issues. The nature of terminal illness may lead to their experience of demoralization. The importance of addressing the demoralization syndrome among PCP was first proposed by Clarke and Kissane (2002). A systematic review reported that the prevalence of demoralization is about 13% to 18% among palliative care patients (Robinson, Kissane, Brooker & Burney, 2016). Only one study examined the prevalence of demoralization among family caregivers of PCP and that aro10% of them suffered from moderate to severe demoralization (Hudson, Thomas, Trauer, Remedios, & Clarke, 2011).
PCP and family caregivers may find it difficult to cope with the challenges associated with the terminal illness, and that they may experience a form of existential distress, which is characterized by a sense of meaninglessness, hopelessness and helplessness (Figueriredo, 2013; Robinson, et al., 2016). Demoralization was considered as a key cause of developing suicidal ideations (Julião, Nunes & Barbosa, 2016).
Conceptualization and definition of demoralization Kissane (2000) conceptualized demoralization as a syndrome with the following diagnostic criteria: 1. The experience of emotional distress such as hopelessness and having meaning and purpose in life lost; 2. Attitudes of helplessness, failure, pessimism, and lack of a worthwhile future; 3. Reduced coping to respond differently; 4. Social isolation and deficiencies in social support; 5.Persistence if the above-mentioned phenomena across 2 or more weeks; and 6. Features of major depression have not superseded as the primary disorder (Robinson et al., 2016, p.96). Demoralization should be differentiated from depression, e.g. demoralized patients may still enjoy the present moment but feel despair towards future (Clarke & Kissane, 2002; Kissane & Doolittle, 2015). Demoralization may exist independently but can also co-exist with depression. Previous studies showed that 14-27.4% of patients were demoralized but not depressive, while 21.7-33% patients experienced both demoralization and depression (Fang et al., 2014).
Factors associated with demoralization Previous studies showed that demoralization was associated with various socio-economic, physical and psychosocial factors. High demoralization was associated with reduced quality of life, emotional and existential distress (e.g. depression, anxiety and desire for hastened death, hopelessness, helplessness and loss of meaning) and declining physiological functions (e.g. pain, fatigue and sleep disorders) (Robinson, Kissane, Brooker & Burney, 2015; Tang, Wang & Chou, 2015). A strong relationship was also found between demoralization and social functioning (Kissane and Doolittle, 2015; Robinson et al., 2015; Tang et. al, 2015). Furthermore, demoralization was found associated with sociodemographic, spiritual and familial factors, such as unemployment, sex, family dysfunction, spiritual problem and dimensions to a person's life (Lee et al., 2011; Li et al, 2017; Kissane and Doolittle, 2015; Robinson et al., 2015).
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Case Only
- Time Perspective
- Cross Sectional
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Must be currently living in the community
- •Chinese who are able to communicate in Cantonese
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who are assessed by social workers as emotionally too distressful for participating in the research.
- •For caregivers
- •Inclusion criteria:
- •Caregivers must be the primary family caregivers of the patients
- •Exclusion criteria:
- •Caregivers who are assessed by social workers as emotionally too distressful for participating in the research.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Demoralization of patients and caregivers
Time Frame: This is a one-time self-reported assessment which will take less than 15 minutes to complete.
Demoralization of patients and caregivers will be measured by the Chinese version of Demoralization Scale (DS).The instrument comprises of 24 items and each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale that ranged from 1 (very disagreed) to 5 (very agreed). Items for each responses will be summed up to create a total score ranging from 0 to 30. The DS also provides 5 subscores, namely, loss of meaning and purpose, dysphoria, disheartenment, helplessness and sense of failure. A higher total score indicates a higher level of demoralization
Secondary Outcomes
- Depression of patients and caregivers(This is a one-time self-reported assessment which will take less than 15 minutes to complete.)
- Perceived Family Support of patients(This is a one-time self-reported assessment which will take less than 15 minutes to complete.)
- Caregiver Strain of caregivers(This is a one-time self-reported assessment which will take less than 15 minutes to complete.)
- Caregiver Support Needs of caregivers(This is a one-time self-reported assessment which will take less than 15 minutes to complete.)
Investigators
Wallace Chi Ho Chan
Associate Professor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
