Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06694597
NCT06694597
Completed
Phase 2

Efficacy and Safety of Astragalus Membranaceus on the Improvement of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Symptoms in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital1 site in 1 country76 target enrollmentMay 1, 2023

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Astragalus Membranaceus Root
Conditions
Alzheimer Disease
Sponsor
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Enrollment
76
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The primary efficacy outcome measure will be the absolute change in the Clinical Dementia Rating
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is characterized by cognitive impairment, mental and behavioural abnormalities, and social dysfunction. Current treatments can only delay the progression of AD, not cure it completely. In vitro studies have shown that Astragalus has toxic effects such as anti-hypoxia injury of nerve cells, anti-free radical damage, anti-excitatory amino acids, etc. It can be used to expand cerebral vessels, increase cerebral blood flow, improve cerebral microcirculation, protect brain cells, and repair damaged brain cells. However, the clinical effects of add-on Astragalus in improving cognition in these patients remain unclear. Therefore, this pragmatic clinical trial aims to determine the efficacy and safety of add-on Astragalus in improving cognition in patients with AD

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 1, 2023
End Date
March 31, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participate voluntarily and sign an informed consent form
  • Age 50-85 years old;
  • Memory loss for at least 6 months with a tendency of progressive deterioration;
  • Mild or moderate patients, i.e. MMSE total score:14\< MMSE total score\<24, 0.5≤CDR-GS≤2;
  • The highest likelihood of AD (medial temporal lobe atrophy visual rating scale grade 2 or higher on coronal imaging) as demonstrated by cranial MRI scanning and oblique coronal hippocampal scanning review at the time of screening;
  • Hachinski Ischemia Scale (HIS) score \< 4;
  • A diagnosis of dementia according to the DSM-V and a diagnosis of "probable AD" according to the NIA-AA criteria;
  • No significant positive signs on neurological examination;
  • The subject has the ability to read, write, and communicate, the subject has a stable and reliable caregiver or at least has frequent contact with the caregiver (at least 2 hours per day, 4 days per week), the caregiver will help the patient to participate in the study, the caregiver must accompany the subject to the study visit, and there must be sufficient interaction with the subject to provide valuable information for the rating of the scales. information for each scale score;
  • The underlying treatment for AD prior to enrolment remains unchanged, but needs to have been on long-term stable use for more than 4 weeks prior to randomisation to the subgroups, and the dose remains stable during the study period. Such drugs include:cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine;

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-AD-induced memory and cognitive impairment, such as a diagnosis of other types of dementia, including, but not limited to, Mixed Disease Dementia, Vascular Dementia, Parkinson's Disease Dementia, Lewy Body Dementia, Huntington's Chorea-related Dementia, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Brain Tumour, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Frontotemporal Lobar Dementia, etc.; Endocrine system pathology (e.g., Thyroid Disease, Parathyroid Disease) as well as Folic Acid, Vitamin B12 deficiency or any other causes of dementia; the presence of impaired consciousness, etc;
  • A history of seizures; psychosis, including but not limited to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or delirium; and
  • Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score \>17;
  • Significant focal lesions on MRI with one of the following: a. \>2 infarct foci \>2cm in diameter; b. Infarct foci in key areas such as thalamus, hippocampus, internal olfactory cortex, parafrontal olfactory cortex, angular gyrus, cortex, and other subcortical grey matter nuclei; and c. Cerebral white matter damage with a Fazekas Scale score ≥3;
  • Patients who have taken other herbal preparations within the past 1 month;
  • Astragalus allergy or contraindication;
  • Presence of abnormal laboratory parameters: impaired renal function (blood Cr \> 1.5xULN) or creatinine clearance (C cr) \< 50mL/min or abnormal liver function (ALT or AST \> 2xULN);
  • Patients who refused or had contraindications to MRI or EEG (pacemakers, coronary and peripheral arterial stents, metallic implants, claustrophobia, or severe visual or hearing impairments); refused to have blood drawn;
  • Hachinski Ischaemia Scale score ≥ 4;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients; and

Arms & Interventions

Astragalus membranaceus

Intervention: Astragalus Membranaceus Root

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The primary efficacy outcome measure will be the absolute change in the Clinical Dementia Rating

Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.

Clinical Dementia Rating scale scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worse.

Secondary Outcomes

  • The absolute scores change in the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [ROCF] recall score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test-copy score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Trail Making Test-A score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Digit Span Forward score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Trail Making Test-B score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Digit Span Backward score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Verbal Fluency Test score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute scores change in the Hamilton Depression Scale score between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the blood pressure between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the level of plasma β-amyloid40 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the level of plasma β-amyloid42 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the level of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the level of plasma neurofilament light chain (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the level of plasma hyper-phosphorylated tau-181 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the neurite density index between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the orientation dispersion index between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in the isotropic volume fraction between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in thickness, between baseline and week 24.(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in volume, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in delta, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in theta, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in alpha, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in beta1, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in beta2, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)
  • The absolute change in gamma, between baseline and week 24(Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials