Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02583776
NCT02583776CompletedPhase 4

NEONATAL HYPOGLYCEMIA and CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL IN PRETERM INFANTS

University Hospital Padova3 sites in 2 countries50 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
50
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
In range - time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Neonatal hypoglycemia is associated with brain injury and impaired neurodevelopment outcomes in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). Glycemic monitoring is usually performed by capillary or central line sampling but does not identify up to 81% of hypoglycemic episodes in preterm newborns.

The investigators aim to assess if a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) can be used to maintain euglycemia (defined as a target value 72-144mg/dl) in VLBWI.

It will be enrolled newborns ≤32 weeks gestational age and/or of birthweight ≤1500 g, within 48 hours of life, they will be randomized in two study arms, both them will wear Dexcom G4 Platinum CGM: 1) Unblinded group (UB): glucose daily intake will be modulated according to CGM (Dexcom G4 Platinum) during the first 7 days of life, alarms for hypos/hyper will be active; 2) Blinded group (B), glucose infusion rate will be modified according to 2-3 daily capillary glucose tests, alarms for hypos will be switched off. Pain at insertion will be evaluated with the validated Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scale.

The estimated numerosity is 50 patients (25 for each arm).

Detailed Description

Background - Neonatal hypoglycemia is a common event during the first week of life and has been associated to brain injuries and poor neurodevelopment. Unfortunately it may be unrecognized for several hours from its occurrence, since it is asymptomatic/poor symptomatic in newborns (Hay WW, 2009; Cornblath, 2000; Adamkin DH, 2011; Burns et al, 2008; Wong, 2013; Duvanel et al, 1999) Despite the dramatic consequences of prolonged hypoglycemia on the neonatal brain are well known, the only tool to recognize it is represented by the capillary glycemic test performed according to risk-based protocols of Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs): they consider a limited window of intervention based on 2-3 glycemic tests a day (Thomas F et al, J. Diab Science Technol. 2014).

Continuous glucose monitoring systems have offered, in the last decade, a new powerful tool to recognize more hypoglycemic events in neonates than traditional monitoring. All the works developed in neonates, to date, have been aimed to evaluate the performance of the CGM devices and have been used to record the effect of medical "intervention" in the correction of hypo or hyperglycemia (Neonatal Insulin Replacement Therapy in Europe (NIRTURE, Beardsall et al, NEJM 2008; McKinlay et al, NEJM 2015) (Harris et al J Pediatrics, 2010; Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2013). The CGM has never been used to drive medical inteventions in newborns and evaluate as independent tool to improve time-in-target for glycemia.

Previous studies demonstrated that up to 81% of the hypoglycemic episodes were not detected with blood glucose measurement (Harris et al, J Pediatrics 2010). All the published studies in neonates, to date, have used Medtronic CGM systems (Medtronic, USA). No adverse effects, associated to the implant of CGM, have been reported neither in late-preterm neither in preterm newborns.

Glycemic control in terms, and moreover, in preterm newborns still represent a challenge for physicians and the wide fluctuation (both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia) commonly observed in such population still remains difficult to be managed with traditional blood glucose monitoring (few data/day, delay of therapeutic intervention).

Aim - The study the Investigators are going to conduct is aimed to evaluate if CGM, as driver of therapeutic decisions in preterm newborns (birthweight ≤1500g, gestational age ≤32 weeks) during the first week of life, may be able to maintain "euglycemia". Euglycemia will be defined as values within the range 72-144mg/dl (4-8mmol/L)(Harris et al J Pediatrics, 2010; Beardsall et al, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013)

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
2 Hours to 2 Days (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •<= 32 weeks gestation
  • •birthweight <1500 g

Exclusion Criteria

  • •birthweight <500g
  • •malformative syndrome
  • •lack of parental consent
  • •chromosomal abnormalities

Arms & Interventions

Unblinded CGM

Experimental

CGM data will be "unblinded", with Hypo/hyperglycemia alarms on. Data will be recorded from CGM every three hours and intervention to adequate glucose intake will be performed to keep glycemia in normal range (72-144mg/dl) if necessary.

Intervention: Unblinded - CGM (Device)

Blinded CGM

Other

Hypo/hyper alarms are off. CGM data will be blinded. Glucose intake will be adequate according to 2-3 capillary glycemic tests per day.

Intervention: Blinded - CGM (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

In range - time

Time Frame: 7 days (minimum 2)

Percentage of time in range 72-144mg/dl

Secondary Outcomes

  • Glycemic modeling(7days)
  • Pain associated to insertion of CGM respect to Pain associated to heel prick(7 days)
  • Acute event associated to glycemic variability and/or hypoglycemia(7days)
  • Glycemic variability and hypoglycemia predictors(7days)
  • hypoglycemia prediction(7days)
  • Hypoglycemia(7days)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Alfonso Galderisi

MD

University Hospital Padova

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Preterm... | Clinical Trial