MedPath

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registry of Henri Mondor Hospital

Recruiting
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Registration Number
NCT05565209
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

Intro: Patients with atrial fibrillation are at significant risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage, which can lead to strokes or systemic embolisms. This risk justifies first-line prescribing of long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in these patients. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure, is an interventional cardiology technique for patients at high risk of stroke related to atrial fibrillation in whom long term anticoagulation therapy cannot be conducted. This procedure involves implantation of an occlusion device into the left atrial appendage to close it and prevent migration of thrombotic material that could otherwise cause distant embolism. Closure of the left atrial appendage avoids long-term prescription of anticoagulants while protecting patients against the risk of systemic embolism and stroke.

Hypothesis/Objective: the main objective of this study is to assess the long term efficacy of left atrial closure, 5 years after the procedure Method: 150 patients will be included prospectively. We will also include restropectively100 other patients, previously treated by left atrial appendage closure at Henri Mondor hospital. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomography data will be obtained by physical examination or medical records.

Conclusion: this study will allow to assess the long term efficacy of left atrial closure in atrial fibrillation patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
250
Inclusion Criteria
  • Any patient for whom an indication has been made for implantation of a device for the closure of the left atrial appendage without restriction of indication and regardless of the outcome of the procedure (implantation success or not)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refusal of the patient to participate in this study
  • Minor patient
  • Patient not affiliated to the French social security system

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Frequency of thrombo-embolic events60months of follow-up after the procedure

The primary efficacy endpoint is the frequency of a combined endpoint including ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms after left atrial appendage closure. This frequency will be expressed as the percentage of patients who presented at least one of these events. Only the first event occurring in each patient will be taken into account, in the case where the same patient would present several events.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of transient ischemic attack (TIA)1 and 5 years after the procedure

Percentage of patients presenting at least one systemic embolism during the study

Percentage of device thrombosis3 months; 1 year; 5 year

Percentage of patients who presented a thrombosis on the device, objectified by transesophageal echography and / or CT scan

Percentage of ischemic stroke1 and 5 years after the procedure

Percentage of patients with at least one ischemic stroke during the study

Comparison of the rate of thromboembolic events to expected values1 and 5 years after the procedure

the observed rate of thromboembolic event will be compared to the expected value, according the individual patients CHA2DS2-VASc scores

Bleedings not-related to the procedure or the device1 year; 5 year

Percentage of patients who presented a bleeding not-related to the procedure or the device

Occlusion of the left atrial appendage3 months

The percentage of left atrial appendage occlusion is defined as the percentage of patients where left atrial appendage is efficiently closed at by transesophageal echography and / or CT scan Time Frame: 3 months

Percentage of systemic embolism1 and 5 years after the procedure

Percentage of patients presenting at least one systemic embolism during the study

Bleeding (all cause)1 year; 5 year

Percentage of patients who presented a bleeding

residual peri-device leak3 months

The percentage a patients with 3 months residual peri-device leak will be determined at transesophageal echography and / or CT scan

All-cause mortality1 and 5 years after the procedure

percentage of all cause deaths

Percentage of migration of the device3 months; 1 year; 5 years

: Percentage of patients who presented a migration of the device, objectified by the echocardiography and / or CT scan

Criteria for Evaluating Associated Antithrombotic Treatments: Discharge, 3, 6, 12 months after the procedure, 1 and 5 years after the procedure

The antithrombotic treatments will be collected at different follow-up times.

The type and duration of anti-thrombotic treatments will be documented using the combined criteria:

* Percentage of patients on injectable or oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents at different follow-up times

* Percentage of patients on injectable or oral anticoagulants at different follow-up times

* The percentage of patients on platelet antiaggregants in single or dual therapy at different follow-up times

Description of the populationAt inclusion

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients will be collected and described, such as: age, sex, medical and surgical history, cardiovascular pharmacological treatments, comorbidities, indication of left atrial closure, HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, anatomical features of the left atrial appendage at inclusion.

Efficacy of the procedureOne hour after the end of the procedure

: At the end of the procedure, the efficiency of the procedure will be described by the percentage of success of the procedure. The successful procedure is defined by a successful implantation of the device in the left atrial appendage without presaging its occlusive character.

One hour after the end of the procedure

Cardiovascular or unexplained death1 and 5 years after the procedure

Percentage of patients who had a cardiovascular or unexplained death during the study

Rate of complications related or potentially related to the device or the implantation procedureperiprocedural period (defined as the time from the day of the procedure to day 7 or discharge, whichever comes last)

: Rate of complications related or potentially related to the device or the implantation procedure

Percentage of pericardial effusion3 months

Percentage of patients who presented a pericardial effusion objectified by trans-thoracic ultrasound

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - CHU HENRI MONDOR

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath