Mitigating Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Rural Diabetics
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 146
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Diabetes Self-care Activities
研究概览
简要总结
The study explored the effects of the cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention on diabetes fatalism, self-care activities, social support, knowledge, perceived self-managment among a rural population.
详细描述
An experimental pretest-posttest control group design was used to assess the effects of a diabetes health promotion intervention among participants recruited from rural churches located in the southern United States. The intervention, called Project Power, is a culturally relevant, church-based diabetes education program that was developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Participating churches were randomized to experimental and control groups using random numbers tables having numerical parity no greater than 2. Since an individual church is the unit of randomization, all of the participants in that church received the same treatment condition. Churches randomized to the intervention group received the health promotion program, and those designated to the control group received an educational brochure. Recruitment, data collection and intervention delivery, for the intervention group, occurred on the church grounds.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 22 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Self-identified African Americans aged 22 years or older, who have been diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 or 2
排除标准
- •Other than African American, younger than 22 years of age
结局指标
主要结局
Diabetes Self-care Activities
时间窗: Baseline
The Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA) (Toobert, Hampson, \& Glascow, 2000) includes multiple choice questions and items about self-care behaviors answered in days per week. The internal consistency of the instrument is adequate (α = .71). The scores ranged from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 105. Higher scores indicated better diabetes self-care.
Diabetes Knowledge
时间窗: Baseline
The Revised Diabetes Knowledge Test: Michigan Diabetes Research Center (Fitzgerald et al., 2016) is a 23-item multiple choice diabetes knowledge test. The scale has good reliability for both the general test (α = .77) and the insulin use subscale (α = .84). The twenty scored items were worth 5 points each for a maximum of 100 points total. Higher scores indicated higher knowledge levels.
Change from Baseline Diabetes Self-care Activities at Three Weeks
时间窗: Three weeks after baseline
The Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA) (Toobert, Hampson, \& Glascow, 2000) includes multiple choice questions and items about self-care behaviors answered in days per week. The internal consistency of the instrument is adequate (α = .71). The scores ranged from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 105. Higher scores indicated better diabetes self-care.
Change from Baseline Diabetes Knowledge at Three Weeks
时间窗: Three weeks after baseline
The Revised Diabetes Knowledge Test: Michigan Diabetes Research Center (Fitzgerald et al., 2016) is a 23-item multiple choice diabetes knowledge test. The scale has good reliability for both the general test (α = .77) and the insulin use subscale (α = .84). The twenty scored items were worth 5 points each for a maximum of 100 points total. Higher scores indicated higher knowledge levels.
次要结局
- Social Support(Baseline and three weeks later)
- Change from Baseline Diabetes Fatalism at Three Weeks(Baseline and three weeks later)
- Change from Baseline Perceived Diabetes Self-Management at Three Weeks(Baseline and three weeks later)
- Change from Baseline Social Support at Three Weeks(Baseline and three weeks later)
- Diabetes Fatalism(Baseline and three weeks later)
- Perceived Diabetes Self-Management(Baseline and three weeks later)
研究者
Laurie Abbott
Assistant Professor
Florida State University