Comparing two techniques of inserting a tube into the airway for breathing purpose, by undergraduate students on mannequi
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/08/035790
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All third-year undergraduate medical students presenting for training to the Department of Anesthesiology of a tertiary care hospital who have done less than 5 intubations
Exclusion Criteria
Undergraduate Students likely to graduate within 06 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the chance of success of glottic visualization and endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy when performed by novice intubators undergoing simulator-based training for normal and difficult airway scenariosTimepoint: Initially the success of intubation will be compared on the first day itself, baseline and then compared again after 06 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess the efficacy of simulation-based training to develop and maintain airway management skills of novice intubatorsTimepoint: by comparing the results byn calling the same subjects to perform intervention after 06 months