Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05903508
NCT05903508CompletedNot Applicable

Comparative Effect of Functional Task Training Versus Function Therapy Program on Gross Motor Function, Range of Motion and Balance in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Riphah International University1 site in 1 country12 target enrollmentStarted: May 23, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
12
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Gross Motor Function Measure scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

cerebral palsy is the brain injury or brain malformation occur before, during and immediately after birth (while brain is still under development) and its effect muscle tone, reflexes, posture coordination gross and fine motor skill and oral motor functioning. The functional training is the physiotherapist and occupational therapy rehabilitation technique focus on strength and function of musculoskeletal system and its help the patients to making their daily life activity easier. The functional task training program consisted of non-walking (i-iii) and walking (iv-v) activities: (i) standing from a seated position; (ii) reaching for an object overhead, which required ankle plantar flexion from the standing position, and returning to the initial position with the heel leaning on the floor; (iii) stepping on and off a bench; (iv) walking up and down stairs; and (v) walking on flat surfaces and ramps. Children with cerebral palsy frequently receive. functional therapy programs the children participated in activities pertaining to everyday skills such as eating, playing, communication, and mobility. To optimize the child's opportunities to practice towards the goals, parents and preschool staff were guided on efficiently encouraging the child. Support and instructions from the professional to help them to develop better motor skills and increase independence in tasks like self-care, play, and recreational activities.so the study aimsto improve balance, gross motor function, and range of motion by using these functional training task and functional therapy program. In my study compare the compare task training versus functional therapy programsm on gross motor function, range of motion on, and balance in cerebral palsy children.

Detailed Description

The randomized control trial will be conducted through convenient sampling. There will be two group the experimental group will receive functional task training. according to GMFS, Pediatric balance scale and goniometer to assess the gross motor function, ROM and balance in cerebral palsy, while control group will receive functional therapy program (bobath technique) to improve gross motor function, ROM and balance in cerebral palsy. The duration of the treatment will be 8 weeks. Gross motor function, pediatric balance scale, and goniometer will be used as outcome measure. Data will be analyzed on spss version 29, normality of the data will be checked and test will be applied according to the normality of the data either in will be parametric test or nonparametric based on the normality

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Participant will get seperate treatment protocol and possible efforts will be put to mask the both groups about thier treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Years to 12 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Both gender
  • •GMFCS (Gross Motor Function Classification System) score is in between 1-2,
  • •Ability to follow command
  • •Cerebral palsy diagnosed child (
  • •Age 6-12yr

Exclusion Criteria

  • •• Deformity like scoliosis. pelvic, oblique, and hip deformity
  • •Age more than 16
  • •Visual disorder
  • •Mental retardation

Arms & Interventions

Functional task training Group.

Active Comparator

In this group patients will performed functional task training program was performed including non-walking (i-iii) and walking activities: (i) standing from a seated position; (ii) reaching for an object overhead, which required ankle plantar flexion from the standing position, and returning to the initial position with the heel leaning on the floor; (iii) stepping on and off a bench; (iv) walking up and down stairs; and (v) walking on flat surfaces and ramps. for 8 weeks, 50 minutes per day, 3 times per week. The individual session lasted approximately 10 minutes including the rest intervals.

Intervention: Functional task training and functional therapy program (Other)

Functional task training Group.

Active Comparator

In this group patients will performed functional task training program was performed including non-walking (i-iii) and walking activities: (i) standing from a seated position; (ii) reaching for an object overhead, which required ankle plantar flexion from the standing position, and returning to the initial position with the heel leaning on the floor; (iii) stepping on and off a bench; (iv) walking up and down stairs; and (v) walking on flat surfaces and ramps. for 8 weeks, 50 minutes per day, 3 times per week. The individual session lasted approximately 10 minutes including the rest intervals.

Intervention: Functional therapy program Group (Other)

functional therapy program

Active Comparator

In this group patients will performed functional therapy program as goal directed training to optimize the child to practice goal including stand when turning around between chair, cycles 5m on stationary bicyle on smooth surface, kicking a ball during 8 weeks, the children practiced a goal in 50 mintute per day and 3 times a week.

Intervention: Functional task training and functional therapy program (Other)

functional therapy program

Active Comparator

In this group patients will performed functional therapy program as goal directed training to optimize the child to practice goal including stand when turning around between chair, cycles 5m on stationary bicyle on smooth surface, kicking a ball during 8 weeks, the children practiced a goal in 50 mintute per day and 3 times a week.

Intervention: Functional therapy program Group (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Gross Motor Function Measure scale

Time Frame: 8 weeks

. The GMFM-88 item scores can be summed to calculate raw and percent scores for each of the five GMFM dimensions of interest selected goal areas and total GMFM-88 scores. The scoring system of the GMFM is a four-point scale divided into five categories (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running)

Goniomete

Time Frame: 8 weeks

It will measure range of motion

Pediatric balance scale

Time Frame: 8 weeks

it is 14 items that measure the balance in the context of everyday task in pediatric population in 3 domain sitting standing and changing of position

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials