FAME II - Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Plus Optimal Medical Treatment (OMT) Verses OMT
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Stenting plus OMTOther: Standard of careOther: OMT
- Registration Number
- NCT01132495
- Lead Sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Brief Summary
The overall purpose of the FAME II trial is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety and cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) versus OMT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
- Detailed Description
Prospective, multi-center, multi-national, multi-continental, randomized clinical trial.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1170
-
Patients with
- stable angina or,
- stabilized angina pectoris or,
- atypical chest pain or no chest pain but with documented silent ischemia
-
at least one stenosis is present of at least 50% in one major native epicardial coronary artery and supplying viable myocardium
-
Eligible for PCI
-
Signed written informed consent
- Patients in whom the preferred treatment is CABG
- Patients with left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
- Patients with a recent STEMI or Non-STEMI
- Prior CABG
- Contra-indication to dual antiplatelet therapy
- LVEF < 30%
- Severe LV hypertrophy
- Planned need for concomitant cardiac surgery
- Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding FFR measurements
- A life expectancy of less than 2 years
- Age under 21
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cohort A: PCI plus OMT Stenting plus OMT PCI plus optimal medical treatment Cohort B Standard of care FFR \> 0.80; treatment according to local practice Cohort A: OMT alone OMT Optimal medical treatment alone
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE) 24 Month MACE: A composite of all cause death, documented MI, unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall MACE 3 years Individual components of the primary end point, cardiac death, and nonurgent revascularization
Trial Locations
- Locations (29)
VA Palo Alto
🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Na Homolce Hospital
🇨🇿Praha, Czechia
Hospices Civils de Lyon
🇫🇷Bron, France
Sodersjukhuset AB
🇸🇪Stockholm, Sweden
Clinical Center Kragujevac
🇷🇸Kragujevac, Serbia
Orebro University Hospital
🇸🇪Orebro, Sweden
Royal Victoria Hospital
🇬🇧Belfast, United Kingdom
Edinburgh Heart Centre
🇬🇧Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
🇬🇧Glasgow, United Kingdom
Kings College Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Southampton University Hospitals NHS
🇬🇧Southampton, United Kingdom
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
🇳🇱Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Klinikum der Universitat Munchen
🇩🇪Munchen, Germany
Tulane University
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
OLV Ziekenhuis
🇧🇪Aalst, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Heart Center Leipzig
🇩🇪Leipzig, Germany
Stadtisches Klinikum Munchen
🇩🇪Munchen, Germany
Isala Klinieken
🇳🇱Zwolle, Netherlands
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria de Ferrara
🇮🇹Ferrara, Italy
Catharina-Ziekenhuis
🇳🇱Eindhoven, Netherlands
Gottsegen Hungarian Institute of Cardiology
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
Rigshospitalet University Hospital
🇩🇰Copenhagen, Denmark
Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Atlanta VA Medical Center
🇺🇸Decatur, Georgia, United States
Northeast Cardiology Associates
🇺🇸Bangor, Maine, United States