CIMT and taVNS for Hemiplegia in Infants
- Conditions
- HemiplegiaConstraint Induced Movement TherapyInfant Development
- Interventions
- Device: transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationOther: Constraint induced movement therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05101707
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Brief Summary
Newborns who are born premature or suffer brain injury at birth are at risk for motor problems that may cause weakness in reaching and grasping on one side of the body. In older children, therapists may use a hand mitt and restraint for the stronger arm, to encourage use of the weaker side, called constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Even with the high intensity therapy of CIMT, it typically takes between 40-120 hours total treatment time for most children to improve their motor skills. A non-invasive form of nerve stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), stimulates a nerve by the ear that enhances learning motor skills. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of taVNS to improve motor skills when paired with CIMT in infants with one-sided weakness at 6-18months of age.
- Detailed Description
Recent pioneering studies have used neuromodulation combined with intensive motor therapies in adults after stroke. Few studies have investigated combining neuromodulation and evidence-based pediatric intensive therapies such as CIMT, and then only in older children with CP to enhance neuroplasticity and improve functional outcomes. The investigators are the first to use non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with a motor task of bottle-feeding in infants with feeding failure. taVNS paired with motor feeding activity was safe and over 50% infants attained full oral feeds who were slated to receive a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). With the unique collaboration of experts in brain stimulation, pediatric translational clinical science and pediatric occupational therapy in this pilot project, the investigators propose to expand the paradigm of pairing neuromodulation with motor training in at-risk infants by exploring the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of delivering taVNS concurrently with CIMT. The hypothesis is that combining taVNS with intensive CIMT may boost neuroplasticity, allowing for delivery of infant therapy at a minimally effective dosage while improving infant outcomes.
The investigators aim to determine the feasibility and safety of taVNS in at-risk infants 6-18mo undergoing CIMT therapy in open label pilot trial and assess both infant tolerability and the therapist's ability to deliver high-quality CIMT along with taVNS.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3
Must have all of the following:
- 6-18 month-old infants with hemiplegia/motor asymmetry
- Must be able to participate in high intensity CIMT
- Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I-IV
Must have none of the following:
- GMFCS level V
- severe motor impairment/quadriplegic involvement
- uncorrected blindness or deafness
- cardiomyopathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CIMT + taVNS transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation The investigators will deliver taVNS paired with 40h of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy for unilateral weakness/hemiplegia CIMT + taVNS Constraint induced movement therapy The investigators will deliver taVNS paired with 40h of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy for unilateral weakness/hemiplegia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method CIMT fidelity 0-1 month Feasibility of delivering high fidelity CIMT therapy sessions while the therapist is also triggering taVNS using the Fidelity of Implementation Measure (FIRM) with scoring range (0-4), higher scores indicate greater consistency of therapy with established CIMT procedure
Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) 0-2 months test of hand function and quality of movement between the right and left sides of the body, scoring range 0-100, higher scores indicate better hand function
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) 0-2 months Gross Motor Function Measure-66 scores range from 0-3, with higher scores indicating better foundational gross motor skills and greater mastery of a task
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) 0-2 months Goal Attainment Scale is an individualized standardized outcome measure that calculates the extent to which a patient's individual therapy goals are met, scored from -2 to +2 with higher scores indicating better than expected outcome, -2 indicating worse than expected outcome
Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) Physical Development domain 0-2 months Developmental Assessment of Young Children, 2nd edition, physical domain is a standardized assessment of fine and gross motor skills, with a mean of 100 +/- 15
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States