Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01013532
NCT01013532UnknownPhase 4

A Multicenter, Double Blind, Factorial Design, Phase IV Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol Long-term Treatment With Aspirin in Ischemic Stroke Patients With High Risk of Cerebral Hemorrhage for the Prevention of Cerebral Hemorrhage and Cardiovascular Events and to Compare the Preventive Effect of Probucol in the Same Patient Group With Non-drug User Group for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events

Asan Medical Center71 sites in 2 countries1,600 target enrollmentStarted: June 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,600
Locations
71
Primary Endpoint
Time to the first occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Through this study, the investigators are to prove that Cilostazol effectively prevent cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke patients with high risk of cerebral hemorrhage, along with no significant increase in the risk of occurrence of hemorrhagic side effects.

The primary hypothesis of this study is; Cilostazol alone or with probucol will reduce the risk of cerebral hemorrhage without increase of cardiovascular events compared to aspirin in the ischemic stroke patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic old cerebral hemorrhage.

This study will prove the superiority of cilostazol on the prevention of cerebral hemorrhagic events without increasing the cardiovascular events against aspirin and the superiority of probucol on the prevention of overall cardiovascular events.

Detailed Description

It has been generally accepted that 'old age' and 'hypertension' may be risk factors not only for cerebral infarction but also for cerebral hemorrhage. Usually 40 to 60 percent of recurrent strokes after cerebral hemorrhage cases are cerebral infarction; and 5 to 10 percent of recurrent stroke after cerebral infarction cases are cerebral hemorrhage.

Consequently, for the reasons described above, hemorrhagic side effects including cerebral hemorrhage have been a great concern, in the usage of antiplatelet agent or anticoagulant for the secondary prevention in the patients with cerebral infarction.

It is reported that the occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage tends to increase in cases of accompanying lacunar infarction which occurs more frequently in Asians than in Westerners, or periventricular ischemic change which increasingly occurs with ageing. Accordingly, the point is that the occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage should be primarily considered in the treatment of cerebral infarction, along with the phenomenon of an ageing population both in Asian countries including Korea.

Nevertheless, so far there has been no clinical research regarding secondary prevention of stroke, particularly considering the risk of occurrence of hemorrhage in cerebral infarction cases. However, according to a recent study, when phosphodiesterase inhibitors including Cilostazol are used independently, or in combination with aspirin, secondary prevention can be improved without increasing the occurrence of hemorrhagic side effects.

Considering this, if it is proved that the agent, Cilostazol, could decrease the risk of occurrence of stoke, along with no significant increase in the risk of occurrence of hemorrhagic side effects, by selecting a patent group with a high risk of cerebral hemorrhage, the agent (Cilostazol) may be recognized as an unique antiplatelet agent applicable to old-aged patient with cerebral infarction who have a certain risk of cerebral hemorrhage.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Factorial
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke within 180 days prior to screening - Adult aged 20 years or older
  • High risk of hemorrhagic stroke (history of intracranial hemorrhage or imaging evidence of previous intracranial hemorrhage)
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction or coronary intervention within 4 weeks
  • Bleeding tendency
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • Hemorrhagic stroke within 6 months
  • Patient who was taking antithrombotic medication other than aspirin and does not agree to change the previous medication
  • Severe cardiovascular disease such as cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure
  • Life expectancy less than one year
  • Contraindication to long term aspirin use
  • Enrolled in other clinical trial within 30 days

Arms & Interventions

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: Cilostazol (Drug)

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: placebo of aspirin (Drug)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: Probucol (Drug)

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: ankle-brachial index (ABI) (Device)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: Cilostazol (Drug)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: Probucol (Drug)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: placebo of aspirin (Drug)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: ankle-brachial index (ABI) (Device)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: intima-medial thickness (IMT) (Device)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: new asymptomatic brain hemorrhage (Device)

Cilostazol+ Probucol

Experimental

100mg cilostazol bid plus probucol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: new ischemic lesions on follow-up FLAIR images (Device)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: Aspirin (Drug)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: placebo of cilostazol (Drug)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: ankle-brachial index (ABI) (Device)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: intima-medial thickness (IMT) (Device)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: new asymptomatic brain hemorrhage (Device)

Aspirin + Probucol

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo cilostazol plus probucol

Intervention: new ischemic lesions on follow-up FLAIR images (Device)

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: intima-medial thickness (IMT) (Device)

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: new asymptomatic brain hemorrhage (Device)

Cilostazol

Experimental

cilostazol plus placebo of aspirin

Intervention: new ischemic lesions on follow-up FLAIR images (Device)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: Aspirin (Drug)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: placebo of cilostazol (Drug)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: ankle-brachial index (ABI) (Device)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: intima-medial thickness (IMT) (Device)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: new asymptomatic brain hemorrhage (Device)

Aspirin

Active Comparator

aspirin plus placebo of cilostazol

Intervention: new ischemic lesions on follow-up FLAIR images (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to the first occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage

Time Frame: time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years

Time to the first occurence of composite cardiovascular events

Time Frame: time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time to the first occurrence of ischemic stroke(time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years)
  • Time to the first occurrence of stroke(time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years)
  • Time to the first occurence of myocardial infarction(time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years)
  • Time to the first occurence of other designated vascular events(time since randomization; follow-up period is 1.0 to 5.5 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sun U. Kwon

Professor

Asan Medical Center

Study Sites (71)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials