跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00480675
NCT00480675已完成不适用

Randomized Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-Guided Versus Blinded Trochanteric Bursa Injections

Johns Hopkins University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 65 人开始时间: 2007年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
65
试验地点
2
主要终点
Numerical pain scores

研究概览

简要总结

The goals of our research project are to study the relationship, if any, between the success of a TB injection (measured by pain relief and general patient satisfaction) and the method in which it was placed. Because fluoroscopy places patients requires a slight risk from radiation exposure and increased cost versus blind injection, it is important to know if there is an advantage to using this technique. The investigators will randomize 64 patients to receive either trochanteric bursa injections with corticosteroid and local anesthetic guided by fluoroscopy, or trochanteric bursa patients to receive trochanteric bursa injections based on landmarks on palpation. The investigators will then determine which method is superior, and whether injecting steroid and local anesthetic into the bursa itself is superior or inferior to injecting it into a tender area outside the bursa.

详细描述

This will be a randomized, controlled study evaluating the value of fluoroscopy in trochanteric bursa injections. Subjects will be recruited solely from the patients we normally see at the Blaustein Pain Treatment Center with a clinical diagnosis of GTPS. Sixty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using sealed envelopes to receive either TB corticosteroid injection done blind or with fluoroscopy. All patients who provide informed consent will be brought into the fluoroscopy suite and placed in the lateral decubitus position. In the patients randomized to receive fluoroscopically guided injections, a 22-gauge needle will be placed into the TB and correct position confirmed by fluoroscopy and contrast injection (1 ml per attempt) before corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection (60 mg of depomedrol and 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine). In the blinded group, one sham, pulsed fluoroscopic image will be taken of the femur, and the injection will be done based only on physical exam (overlying the area of maximal tenderness) and landmarks. Prior to the injection, 1 ml of contrast will be administered and another image taken to determine whether or not the needle is within the bursa, but this will not alter the injection. After contrast administration, the same corticosteroid and bupivacaine injection will be administered. The 2 main questions we propose to answer are: 1) whether using fluoroscopy for TB injections results in improved outcomes (comparison of the 32 patients in each group); and 2) whether injecting into the bursa provides superior results than performing non-bursal injections into the area of maximal tenderness (comparison of 32 patients who receive fluoroscopically-guided bursa injections + those patients whose blinded injection was noted to be intra-bursal vs. those patients whose blinded injection was extra-bursal).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age > 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of trochanteric bursitis

排除标准

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to contrast
  • Untreated coagulopathy

结局指标

主要结局

Numerical pain scores

时间窗: 1 and 3 month post-injection

次要结局

  • SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, Satisfaction(1 and 3 months post-injection)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Randomized Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-Guided... | 临床试验