Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2018/05/013808
CTRI/2018/05/013808Not yet recruitingPhase 2

Comparison of levocetirizine up-dosing versus combination of levocetrizine and desloratidine in chronic urticaria not responding to standard levocetrizine dose: An open-label parallel-arm randomized controlled trial

Self1 site in 1 country240 target enrollmentStarted: May 15, 2018Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Self
Enrollment
240
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
•Proportion of patients achieving complete control of urticaria, as measured by urticaria control test (UCT)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Chronic urticaria isa common disease affecting 0.5% to 1% of individuals (lifetime prevalence).Management of the disease still remains unclear despite multiple clinicaltrials. Second-generation H1-antihistamines are recommended as first-linetherapy; the choice and doses of antihistamines and associated drugs are notspecified. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines recommend increasing the dose ofanti-histaminics up to 4-times in patients non-responding to the conventionaldoses of anti-histamines. Drug-related adverse effects, such as sedation is aconcern with higher doses of the same antihistamine. Combination of twodifferent group of second generation antihistamines may be more efficacious forthe same and associated with less risk of sedation. However, there are no studiescomparing the standard guideline with combination of two second generationantihistamines. So there is need for a clinical trial comparing these tworegimens for effective management of the urticaria not responding to thestandard dose of antihistamine.Given the lack ofcontrolled studies assessing the efficacy and safety of high-dose non-sedatingantihistamines in CU, patient safety should be a key consideration whenchoosing a specific antihistamine. Additionalwell-controlled, well-designed clinical trials in CU are required to clarifywhich non-sedating antihistamines should be used, in what dose, and for howlong, when CU does not respond to standard therapy. Clinical recommendationsregarding the use of first-generation antihistamines, increased dosages ofsecond-generation antihistamines, and third- and fourth-line alternatives forCU are based on incomplete and inconsistent data.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Computer generated randomization
Masking
Not Applicable

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • a)Patients >18 years of age b)Patients fulfilling the definition of chronic spontaneous urticaria which is urticarial lesions occurring most days of the week (at least 3 times a week) lasting for 6 weeks or more with no identifiable cause on history or examination.

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1.Patients not fulfilling the diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria 2.Patients <18 years of age 3.Patients unwilling to participate in the study 4.Patients with physical urticaria, contact urticaria, drug-induced urticaria and urticarial vasculitis 5.Pregnant or breast-feeding female patients 6.Use of systemic steroids or other immunomodulators/immunosuppressants in the last 4 weeks; antihistamines in the last 7 days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

•Proportion of patients achieving complete control of urticaria, as measured by urticaria control test (UCT)

Time Frame: 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • •Proportion of patients achieving complete control of urticaria, as measured by urticaria control test (UCT)(7 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Self
Sponsor Class
Research institution and hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials