A comparison of spinal bupivacaine and ropivacaine heavy in pregnant patients undergoing caesarian surgery .
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O269- Pregnancy related conditions, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/04/051367
- Lead Sponsor
- MGM Medical College and Hospital Aurangabad
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Pregnant Females between age 18 to 40 years.
2. Patients belonging to ASA grade 1 and 2.
3. Elective Caesarian Section under Spinal Anaesthesia.
4. Subjects willing to sign informed consent for participation in study.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Subjects with suspected inability to comply with the study procedure.
2. Patients under going caesearian section for fetal distress , Hypertensive disorders of
pregnancy and antepartum haemorrhage.
3. Known allergy to the study drug
4. History of Liver, Renal & Cardiac diseases.
5. BMI >3
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric ropivacaine (0.75%) and hyperbaric <br/ ><br>bupivacaine (0.5%) for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean sectionTimepoint: 1. Onset of sensory block <br/ ><br>2. Maximum height of sensory block <br/ ><br>3. Duration of Sensory block <br/ ><br>4. Onset of motor block <br/ ><br>5. Duration of Motor block
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Neonatal apgar score <br/ ><br>2. Hemodynamic parameters (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Pressure). <br/ ><br>3. Incidence of complications like bradycardia and Hypotension.Timepoint: APGAR SCORE,MAP ,HR