COMET India Follow-up Trial
- Conditions
- AnxietyDepressive SymptomsHappiness
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Common Elements Toolbox
- Registration Number
- NCT05138120
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Brief Summary
We are evaluating an online single-session intervention for mental health promotion among Indian college students.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- College Student
- Access to internet
- Proficient in English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Common Elements Toolbox Common Elements Toolbox -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Depression questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression.
Change in the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Well-being questionnaire. Total scores range from 7 to 35. Higher values indicate higher well-being scores.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7) Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Anxiety questionnaire. Total scores range from 0-21. Lower scores indicate less anxiety.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Perceived Stress Scale-4 Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Questionnaire measuring perceived stress. Scores range from 0-16, with higher scores indicating greater stress.
Ratings on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Immediately after the intervention Questionnaire measuring the acceptability of an intervention. Acceptability refers to the perception that a given treatment is agreeable or satisfactory. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability ratings.
Ratings on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Immediately after the intervention Questionnaire measuring the appropriateness of an intervention. Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit or relevance of an intervention. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness.
Mechanisms of Change Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Participants answered questions relating to each module's mechanism of change on a 7-point Likert Scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".
Specifically, we asked participants:
How capable they feel about managing negative thoughts; If they will intentionally spend time doing activities they enjoy; If they will notice and appreciate good things; If they willSecondary Control Up to 8 weeks post-intervention We asked participants three items to assess secondary control (Weisz et al., 2010). The items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Very false") to 3 ("Very true").
The three items are:
When something bad happens, I can find a way to think about it that makes me feel better.
After a really hard day, I can make myself feel better by remembering some good things that happened.
When bad things happen to me that I can't control, there are lots of things I can do to feel better.
Higher scores indicate greater secondary control.Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Up to 8 weeks post-intervention Questionnaire measuring positive affect and negative affect. Scores on the positive affect subscale range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Scores on the negative affect subscale range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.