Electrostimulation of Pelvic floor muscle in a female with Stress and stress predominant mixed Urinary Incontinence – A Randomised controlled trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Arpan Yadav
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- 1. Number of women with self-reported continence (no urinary incontinence, as reported by women), dry pad test and Improved quality of life on ICIQ-UI_SF Questionarre
Overview
Brief Summary
Title- Electrostimulation of Pelvic floor muscle in a female with Stress and stress predominant mixed Urinary Incontinence
Introduction
Prevalence estimates of SUI range from 3% to 25% of adult women, with older women more likely to be affected (1). Quality of life and sexual function are substantially impaired by the fear of leakage, resulting in avoidance of social or physical activities which might cause it, embarrassment and poor sleep (2). SUI can severely impact the ability to carry out daily activities, resulting in debilitating embarrassment, social isolation and considerably decreased health-related quality of life (3). Women with SUI may be less likely to participate in physical activity, which in turn has a detrimental impact on overall health because inactivity is a risk factor for many diseases (4). Electrical stimulation (ES) has emerged as a first-line alternative to PFMT in women who are unable to contract their pelvic floor muscles voluntarily or as a second-line treatment if PFMT alone is not sufficiently effective. It may also be beneficial to combine ES with the PFMT and drug therapy.
Aim of Study:
To determine the effectiveness of electrical stimulation in combination with other treatment like Pelvic floor muscle therapy(PFMT),Drugs (Anticholinergic and beta 3 agonist) in women with Stress and stress predominant mixed Urinary Incontinence
Materials And Methods: Randomised control trial
Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Stress Predominant Mixed Urinary Incontinence will be based on Clinical history,3 days Bladder diary, ICIQ-UI-SF ,Local examination (Cough stress test),Baseline Pad test
Patient will be randomised by method of permuted block randomisation
Randomisation is be done by Physiotherapist at their department to conceal allotement, who is not the part of study,
Participants will be allocated to the combined intervention group (n = 30) , They will be receiving self-exercises of the pelvic floor muscles(PFMT) 3 times a day per weekly along with Drugs (Anticholinergic and beta 3 agonist), and the Electro Stimulation of pelvic floor muscle (20 min session on 3-5 days per week for at least 6 week).
Participants in the comparison group (n = 30) will be receiving the PFMT along with Drugs(Anticholinergic and beta 3 agonist)
Muscle stimulator machine will be delivering Surge faradic(SF) Intermittent direct current with -
i. Frequency 50-100 HZ
ii. Itensity 0-7 mA with 7 sec stimulation and 3 sec relaxation time
iii. Transcutaneous electrode will be placed on the labia majora or bulbocavernous muscle and Perianal region and on suprapubic skin surface
Intervention Group 1( n-30)- PFMT with Electro stimulation with Drugs
Comparison Group 2(n-30) – PFMT with Drug
Outcome measurement will be assessed by Subjective satisfaction (Clinically no leak Assess by Bladder diary , ICIQ-UI-SF) ,Bladder diary for 3 days,Pad test (before and after treatment) ,and improvement of stress cough test
Study outcomes will be measure at baseline and at the end of the 6-week period of combined therapy
Inclusion Criteria:
Female Patients presenting with clinically diagnosed Stress and stress predominant mixed Urinary Incontinence
Exclusion criteria:
Urgency urinary incontinence alone
A prolapse greater than stage II on examination (>1cm below the hymen on straining)
Pregnant or had given birth in the past six months
Who were receiving treatment for pelvic cancer
Neurogenic bladder
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical Analysis will be done using SPSS V.26(IBM SPSS Inc) software. Categorical variables will be compared using Chi-squared test and continuous variables were using T-test respectively. P valve <0.05 will be consider statistically significant
Outcome:
Ø Outcome measurement will be assessed by Subjective satisfaction (Clinically no leak Assess by Bladder diary , International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire–Short Form for Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI-SF) ,Bladder diary for 3 days,Pad test (before and after treatment) ,and improvement of stress cough test
Ø Study outcomes will be measured at baseline and at the end of the 6-week period of combined therapy
1)Primary outcome: Cure: number of women with self-reported continence (no urinary incontinence, as reported by women)
2)Secondary outcomes:
Satisfaction with treatment
Quantification of symptoms (e.g. number of incontinence episodes (every 24 hours), number of micturitions every 24 hours will be assessed by 3 days bladder diary, ICIQ-UI-SF, Pad tests,stress cough test )
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 35.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- Female
Inclusion Criteria
- •Female Patients presenting with clinically diagnosed Stress and stress predominant mixed Urinary Incontinence.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age less than 30 yr and more than 60 yrs femalw patient.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
1. Number of women with self-reported continence (no urinary incontinence, as reported by women), dry pad test and Improved quality of life on ICIQ-UI_SF Questionarre
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at baseline,6 week, and at 3 month
2.Satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at baseline,6 week, and at 3 month
Quantification of symptoms (e.g. number of incontinence episodes (every 24 hours), number of micturitions every 24 hours will be assessed by 3 days bladder diary, ICIQ-UI-SF, Pad tests,stress cough test
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed at baseline,6 week, and at 3 month
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Arpan Yadav
sgpgims,lucknow