Novel Thin Bronchoscope Versus Ultrathin Bronchoscope for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules: A Multicenter, Randomised Trial

This is a prospective, randomised, non-inferior, multicenter study. The inclusion criteria are patients whose chest imaging shows suspiciously malignant peripheral lung nodules (the nodules are surrounded by lung tissue and are located below the segmental bronchus), and the diameter of the lesion is between 8mm and 30mm. The subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the 3.0mm outer diameter/1.7mm forceps channel ultrathin bronchoscope group (UTB-VBN-EBUS group), the 3.3mm outer diameter/2.0mm forceps channel novel thin bronchoscope combined with guide sheath group (TB1-VBN-EBUS-GS group), and the 4.2mm outer diameter/2.8mm forceps channel novel thin bronchoscope combined with guide sheath group (TB2-VBN-EBUS-GS group). All procedures were performed using UTB or TB with the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS), but without fluoroscopy. A small forceps was used in UTB-VBN-EBUS group and TB1-VBN-EBUS-GS group, while a standard forceps was used in TB2-VBN-EBUS-GS group. Primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints include total examination time, the time from bronchoscope insertion of the glottis to the time of removing from the glottis; duration time of finding lesions, the time from insertion of ultrasound probe to withdrawal of ultrasound probe when a rEBUS view was seen; the proportion of lesions visible by rEBUS; factors affecting the diagnostic yield, difference in the bronchus level reached with the bronchoscope; difference in diagnostic yield; and complication rate. Complication rate includes adverse events related to the procedure during or within 1 month after the operation.