MedPath

Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients With High Surgical Difficulty

Completed
Conditions
Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
Registration Number
NCT06752538
Lead Sponsor
Fujian Medical University
Brief Summary

While robotic gastrectomy (RG) is increasingly used in gastric cancer surgery, its potential advantages over laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in high surgical difficulty (HSD) cases remain debated.

Detailed Description

This retrospective cohort study included 3,534 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at eight high-volume hospitals. HSD was defined by any of the following criteria: operative time exceeding the third quartile, intraoperative estimated blood loss ≥ 400 mL, or conversion to open surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were conducted to compare short- and long-term outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
3534
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with postoperatively histologically confirmed T1-4aN0-3bM0 gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent RG or LG
Exclusion Criteria
  • Remnant gastric cancer
  • Previous malignant
  • ASA class >3
  • Use of indocyanine green
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Loss to follow-up
  • Combined resection

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall survivalWithin 3 years after surgery

Telephone follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
recurrence36 months

Telephone follow-up

Postoperative complications30 days after surgery

Postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and categorized as surgical or medical

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

🇨🇳

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath