Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2019/02/017375
CTRI/2019/02/017375
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1

Comparison of functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using all inside technique versus outside in technique â?? a double blind randomized controlled trial. - anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES BHUBANESWAR0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsHealth Condition 1: M968- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of musculoskeletal system, not elsewhere classified

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: M968- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of musculoskeletal system, not elsewhere classified
Sponsor
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES BHUBANESWAR
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES BHUBANESWAR

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1 \- Patients with symptoms of knee pain or instability who are diagnosed as having ACL tear after clinical examination and confirmed with radiological investigations and diagnostic arthroscopy.
  • •2 \- Patients who have tried conservative treatment with hamstring exercises and failed to improve or improved partially
  • •3 \- Active, motivated patients aged between 20 to 60 years and belonging to either sex who are involved in heavy physical activities or athletic activities or patients who are unwilling to modify their present active life style
  • •4\- Associated with medial or lateral meniscus tear injuries.
  • •5 \- Patients who have recovered from the acute inflammatory stage of injury with return of full range of knee motion and decrease in swelling which usually takes 4 to 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\-Patients who are not falling in the above age group
  • •2\-Patients with associated injuries of lower limb (bony injuries or injuries involving other ligaments) and injury to spine
  • •3\-Patients who have radiological evidence of Grade III or IV osteoarthritis knee (Kellegren and Lawrence grading)
  • •4\- Patients requiring revision ACL reconstruction.
  • •5\- Patients with stiff knee or restricted range of motion
  • •6\-Patients having local skin lesion which is not amenable to any intervention
  • •7\- Patients who are not fit to undergo surgery from anesthesia point of view
  • •8\- Patients who are unwilling to give consent for surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Phase 4
Functional outcome comparison following arthroscopic biceps soft tissue tenodesis with pectoralis major attachment and biceps tenotomy: a randomized controlled trial studyong head of biceps tendon pathologyLong head of biceps tendon
TCTR20240515004Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital18
Completed
Not Applicable
Functional outcome following arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilisatio
ISRCTN43125240Record provided by the NHS Trusts Clinical Trials Register - Department of Health (UK)100
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical outcome comparison between Arthroscopic complete RC repair and complete RC repair with biceps re-routing(BR) for rotator cuff tear
KCT0004456The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital120
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Study of Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate ligament (ACL)Reconstruction Using Two Different Techniques
CTRI/2019/07/020405Office of the DGAFMS
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Key hole Posterior knee ligament Reconstruction studyHealth Condition 1: S835- Sprain of cruciate ligament of knee
CTRI/2020/03/023979STANLEY MEDICAL COLLEGE