Success of two arch wires to relieve irregularity of teeth
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M263- Anomalies of tooth position of fully erupted tooth or teethHealth Condition 2: M264- Malocclusion, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/10/016038
- Lead Sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 44
1.With age group of 12-30 years of age at
the start of treatment,
2.Permanent dentition including the
maxillary second molars.
3.Arch length deficiency with lower
anterior crowding between 3 and 6 mm
4.Patients having no impacted teeth
present in the dentition except third
molars,
5.Treatment plan including extraction of
the mandibular first premolars
1.Patient with crowding less than 4 mm
2.Patients with spacing in the lower
anterior region.
3.Patients whose treatment plans included
extraction of a lower incisor.
4.Patients with a blocked-out tooth that
did not allow for placement of the
bracket at the initial bonding
appointment.
5.Patients with a relevant medical
history.
6.Patients with poor oral hygiene or
periodontally compromised teeth
7.Any previous history of orthodontic
tooth movement
8.Patient with cleft lip and palate or
with any other craniofacial anomaly
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the alignment efficiency of two nickel titanium arch wire during orthodontic treatment in terms of time required to reach the working arch wire.Timepoint: At the start of treatment (T0)-Placement of 0.014 NiTi & 0.014 Cu NiTi <br/ ><br>1st month (T1)-Evaluation of 0.014 NiTi & Cu-NiTi & placement of 0.016 NiTi and Cu-NiTi. <br/ ><br>2nd month (T2)-Evaluation of 0.016 NiTi & Cu-NiTi & placement of 0.018 NiTi and Cu-NiTi <br/ ><br>3rd month (T3)-Evaluation of 0.018 NiTi & Cu-NiTi & placement of 0.019X0.025 NiTi & Cu-NiTi <br/ ><br>4th month (T4)-Evaluation of 0.019X0.025 NiTi & Cu-NiTi & placement of 0.019X0.025 Stainless steel for both the groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessing pain perception during orthodontic treatment in conventional NiTi vs Copper NiTi wires.Timepoint: The questionnaire recorded orthodontic pain after, 4hours, 24hours, and 1 week after each archwire change by means of a 10-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) <br/ ><br>;Assessment of root resorption during orthodontic treatement in conventional NiTi vs Copper NiTi wiresTimepoint: Assessed before and after completion of alignment <br/ ><br>at baseline and at the end of 5th month