Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02221349
NCT02221349
Completed
Not Applicable

A Randomized Clinical Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene

Procter and Gamble1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentAugust 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Potassium oxalate
Conditions
Dentin Sensitivity
Sponsor
Procter and Gamble
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline Air Challenge
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of normal oral hygiene with two different marketed dentifrices, on longer term dentinal hypersensitivity response following use of potassium oxalate desensitizers.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2014
End Date
October 2014
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Procter and Gamble
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form
  • Complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement
  • Be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee
  • Have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to the air challenge.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Self-reported pregnancy or nursing
  • Severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession
  • Active treatment of periodontitis
  • Fixed facial orthodontic appliances
  • A history of kidney stones
  • Known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate
  • Any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study
  • An inability to undergo any study procedures.

Arms & Interventions

oxalate liquid & gel plus SnF2 paste

Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied

Intervention: Potassium oxalate

oxalate liquid & gel plus SnF2 paste

Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied

Intervention: Stannous fluoride paste

oxalate liquid & gel plus NaF paste

Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Sodium fluoride paste, self applied

Intervention: Potassium oxalate

oxalate liquid & gel plus NaF paste

Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Sodium fluoride paste, self applied

Intervention: Sodium fluoride paste

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline Air Challenge

Time Frame: 60 days

The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows: 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subjects responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale(60 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials