MedPath

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Real-time Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
Interventions
Procedure: Ultrasound-assisted localization, US-AS
Procedure: Real-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTG
Registration Number
NCT06241716
Lead Sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-assisted localization and real-time ultrasound-guided combined spinal-epidural anesthesia via paramedian approach in elderly patients

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
96
Inclusion Criteria
  • Elderly patients (≥ 60 years old);
  • ASA Grade I to III.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Severe obesity (BMI>35kg/m2);
  • Spinal deformity or surgical history;
  • Allergic to local anesthetics;
  • There are coagulation disorders;
  • Communication barriers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ultrasound-assisted localization, US-ASUltrasound-assisted localization, US-AS-
Ultrasound-assisted localization, US-ASReal-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTG-
Real-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTGReal-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTG-
Real-time ultrasound guidance, US-RTGUltrasound-assisted localization, US-AS-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First puncture success rate1 year

The proportion of the first successful puncture to the total successful puncture

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Positioning time1 year

The time required for pre-scanning and positioning (In seconds).

Procedure time1 year

The time from the contact of the ultrasonic probe to the end of the operation (In seconds).

Depth and width of posterior dural complex1 year

Obtained by ultrasonic measurement (In centimetres).

Skin puncture times1 year

Count the number of skin piercings (In seconds).

Number of redirects1 year

Count the number of needle redirection

Patient satisfaction score (How satisfied the patient is with the whole procedure)1 year

1 is very dissatisfied; 2 is not satisfied; 3 is generally satisfied; 4 are relatively satisfied; A score of 5 is very satisfactory

Operator satisfaction score (How satisfied the patient is with the whole procedure)1 year

1 is very dissatisfied; 2 is not satisfied; 3 is generally satisfied; 4 are relatively satisfied; A score of 5 is very satisfactory

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tianzhu Liu

🇨🇳

Wuhan, Hubei, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath