跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/03/063855
CTRI/2024/03/063855已完成4 期

Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350+ Electrolytes For Fecal Disimpaction in Pediatric Functional Constipation: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Institute of Medical sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospitalk1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2024年3月18日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
The proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in Each Arm

研究概览

简要总结

Childhood constipation is a common but serious gastrointestinal disorder prevalent worldwide. In approximately 90-95% of children, it is of functional origin i.e., without an identifiable organic pathology. Thirty to seventy-five percent of children with functional constipation also have fecal impaction. The treatment strategy for functional constipation includes fecal disimpaction and maintenance therapy to ensure regular bowel movements. ESPGHAN & NASPGHAN guidelines as well as Indian Academy of Pediatrics emphasize that maintenance therapy remains ineffective until disimpaction has been achieved. If initial disimpaction is skipped, oral laxative therapy may paradoxically worsen fecal incontinence/encopresis attributable to overflow diarrhea. 

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based laxatives have been recommended as the first-line therapeutic agents for both disimpaction as well as maintenance therapy in childhood functional constipation. The commonly used formulations are PEG 3350 with a molecular weight between 3200 and 3700 g/mol and PEG 4000 with an approximate molecular weight of 4000 g/mol. Both are shown to be effective in pediatric constipation management in placebo-controlled trials. PEG 3350 + Electrolyte (E) is more widely used than PEG 4000 for the management of constipation. This might be because of the perception that PEG 3350 + E is safer in terms of preventing electrolyte imbalance. However, because of the inclusion of electrolytes, PEG 3350+ E solution taste saltier than PEG 4000. Many patients struggle to tolerate the unpleasant taste resulting in the high incidence of non-compliance and treatment failure. To date, no pediatric trials have compared PEG 4000 versus PEG 3350+E on a head-to-head basis for the treatment of the initial but most important & crucial step of pediatric function constipation management i.e. Fecal disimpaction.

Therefore, the present study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy & tolerability of PEG 4000 versus PEG 3350+ E for fecal disimpaction in pediatric functional constipation. Patients between age 1-16 years having functional constipation (as per ROME IV criteria) with fecal impaction will be included. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either PEG 4000 or PEG 3350+E at a ratio of 1:1. They will be stratified into 3 different age groups: 1-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12–16 years.  They will receive either of the PEG solutions (as per allocation) at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day for 6 consecutive days or till the resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier. The resolution of fecal impaction is defined as the passage of clear liquid stool and the disappearance of palpable abdominal fecolith.

Primary outcome is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in each arm.

Secondary outcomes are defined as follows:

1.Total no of Days required to achieve fecal disimpaction in each arm

2.Cumulative dose of PEG required for fecal disimpaction in each arm

3.Proportion of subjects (> 5 years age) reporting palatability issues in each arm

4.Proportion of subjects discontinuing the treatment due to palatability issues in each arm

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant, Investigator, Outcome Assessor and Date-entry Operator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
1.00 Year(s) 至 16.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1-16 years age admitted to the inpatient department
  • Having h/o functional constipation as per ROME IV criteria 3)with Fecal impaction defined as A hard mass in the lower abdomen identified on physical examination or Dilated rectum filled with large amount of stool on per rectal Examination or Excessive stool in the colon on abdominal radiography as determined by a radiologist.

排除标准

  • Patients with drug-induced constipation 2) Organic constipation ie, I.Neurological disorders eg.
  • Neural tube defects/cerebral/motor neuron diseases/neuro regression syndromes II.Hirschsprung disease, or anal anomalies III.Known metabolic or endocrine disorders 3) Patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy) 4) Children with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction 5) Patients taking PEG (either at the time of enrolment or within 2 month before enrolment) 6) Patients receiving medication at enrolment or within 1 month before enrolment influencing gastrointestinal motility function (eg, lactulose, loperamide, cisapride) 7) Known history of Allergy to PEG formulations 8) Patients having comorbidity of any other system like CVS/Respiratory/CNS etc 9)Known case of Chronic kidney disease or history of acute kidney injury in past 3 monthes.

结局指标

主要结局

The proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in Each Arm

时间窗: 6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier

次要结局

  • Total no of Days required to achieve fecal disimpaction in each arm(6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier)
  • Cumulative PEG dose required for fecal disimpaction in each arm(6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier)
  • Proportion of subjects reporting palatability issues in each arm(6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is eariler)
  • Proportion of subjects discontinuing the treatment due to palatability issues in each arm(6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier)

研究者

发起方
Institute of Medical sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospitalk
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Kalpana Panda

Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验