跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05459038
NCT05459038尚未招募不适用

Clinical Validation of the C-Arm Rotational View (CARV) to Avoid Rotational Malalignment After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures.

University Medical Center Groningen2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2022年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
100
试验地点
2
主要终点
Rotational (mal)alignment

研究概览

简要总结

Tibia shaft fractures are common long bone fractures in the field of Orthopaedic Trauma. In the USA, a total of 492.000 tibial fractures were reported per year by the National Center of Health Statistics (NCHS). Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the treatment of choice for shaft fractures. However, rotational malalignment (RM) remains an iatrogenic pitfall with a prevalence up to 30%.

From a clinical point of view, there is limited knowledge on how to avoid RM during IMN. Clinical estimation of tibial alignment is difficult, resulting frequently in RM following IMN. Low-dose CT-assessment is considered the gold standard to objectify RM, but is performed after surgery when the opportunity for direct revision has passed. Both difficulties in intraoperative clinical judgement of tibial alignment as well as postoperative detection of RM when the possibility for direct revision has passed, do support the need for an easy-to-use intraoperative fluoroscopy protocol to minimize the risk for RM during IMN of tibial shaft fractures.

Recently, a standardized intraoperative fluoroscopy protocol named the 'C-Arm Rotational View (CARV)' was determined in order to improve the accuracy of alignment control during IMN of tibial shaft fractures. CARV includes predefined fluoroscopy landmarks of the uninjured side to correct for rotational malalignment of the injured side in which the rotation of the C-Arm Image Intensifier is used. Promising preliminary results were found to reduce the risk on RM following IMN of tibia fractures. However, a prospective trial is needed to determine the performance of CARV in clinical practice. Therefore, a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial is designed to assess the clinical feasibility and potential benefits of the CARV-protocol. The following primary research question was defined: can the risk for RM following IMN of tibial shaft fractures be minimized by use of the CARV-protocol?

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •All consecutive patients (≥18 years) with an open or closed tibia shaft fracture, who are eligible for IMN, will be asked to enroll in the study

排除标准

  • •The following exclusion criteria will be used: age <18 years, fractures not suitable for IMN and pathological fractures.

研究组 & 干预措施

Interventional group

Experimental

Patients assigned to the interventional group will undergo an identical surgical procedure as patients assigned to the control group. The only difference with the control group is that tibial alignment will be obtained according to the standardized CARV-protocol.

干预措施: C-Arm Rotational View (CARV) (Diagnostic Test)

Control group

No Intervention

Patients assigned to the control group will undergo an identical surgical procedure as patients assigned to the interventional group. The only difference with the intervention group is that tibial alignment will be obtained according to present unstandardized clinical standards

结局指标

主要结局

Rotational (mal)alignment

时间窗: Up to 12 months after initial surgery

Determine the incidence of RM using postoperative CT-assessment. In literature, RM is defined as a rotation ≥10 degrees relative to the contralateral side. However, considering the physiological left-right difference of 4 degrees between left and right-sided tibiae, with right-sided tibiae on average 4 degrees more externally rotated, RM is defined as malrotation of \< -6 degrees or \>14 degrees in right-sided tibiae and \< -14 degrees or \>6 degrees in left-sided tibiae. A negative angle represents internal rotation and positive angle external rotation.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验