MedPath

De-Implementation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use After Cardiac Device Procedures

Not Applicable
Conditions
Antibiotics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
Interventions
Other: Chart Review
Registration Number
NCT05020418
Lead Sponsor
VA Boston Healthcare System
Brief Summary

This project will use automated audit and feedback to improve compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines for CIED procedures that we anticipate will translate into better outcomes for our patients. A multi-faceted implementation bundle to promote de-implementation of guideline discordant care will be tested at three intervention sites. Materials and tools will then be disseminated throughout the VA healthcare system if the intervention is found to be effective.

Detailed Description

Aim I tests the hypothesis that a multi-faceted implementation strategy that includes educational sessions with members of electrophysiology teams and locally-adapted monthly surveillance reports about guideline-concordant pre-procedural antimicrobial use and guideline-discordant post-procedural antimicrobial use, 90-day incidence of CIED infections, and 90-day incidence of C. difficile infections and 7-day incidence of AKI that will be delivered to local infectious diseases champions and shared with electrophysiology teams using blended facilitation will promote uptake of best practices and improve outcomes. This hypothesis incorporates learning/unlearning and fills a major gap caused by the dearth of rigorous de- implementation and de-adoption studies. Aim II tests the hypothesis that electronic health records (EHRs) and medical informatics have advanced to the point that it will be feasible, during the next four years, to establish an audit and feedback surveillance system that can be scaled and disseminated widely across the VA.

This study will use mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to address the study aims. This will include interviews with key stakeholders and quantitative measurement of quality metrics (e.g., pre-and post-procedure antimicrobial use) and outcomes (e.g., cardiac device infections, acute kidney injuries, C. difficile infections).

All patients receiving a cardiac device implantation within the VA healthcare system during the study period may be potentially included. Medical records previously reviewed and accessed may also be included for validation, testing, and optimization of electronic algorithms. In addition to the VA patients who will participate, key stakeholders for infection prevention in the cardiac device laboratory (e.g., providers, nurses, electrophysiology laboratory staff) will also participate in interviews. Active implementation will occur at 3 VA sites, a passive dissemination process will occur at all VA sites with a cardiac device laboratory (\~78 VA sites).

High quality studies establish that prolonged prophylaxis has no beneficial impact on CIED-related infection rates but worsens outcomes and leads to preventable deaths. Despite guidelines specifically recommending against prolonged prophylaxis, this practice is common in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories, including VA and non-VA hospitals. At the same time, antimicrobial resistance and overuse represent critical threats to the health of the population. This intersection- inappropriate prescribing and a critical need to improve use-- creates an urgent need for research into methods to promote adoption of best antimicrobial use and de-implementation of ineffective and harmful prescribing. IT-based solutions for improving antimicrobial use, including antimicrobial prophylaxis, is a quality-improvement strategy endorsed by The Joint Commission. This project will advance this concept and couple learning/unlearning processes to promote uptake of best practices. If effective, this model can be replicated in other settings of care to improve antimicrobial use.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100000
Inclusion Criteria
  • This study is open to any adult VA patient with data about a cardiac device procedure performed in the electrophysiology laboratory entered into the national VA EHR.
Exclusion Criteria
  • None

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cardiac Device CohortChart ReviewThis study is open to any adult VA patient with data about a cardiac device procedure performed in the electrophysiology laboratory entered into the national VA EHR. During FY 20-FY 24, we anticipate that this will include approximately 9,000 patients per year, or a total of 50,000 patients. In addition, cases that were previously accessed and used to develop the infection monitoring system, and the quality metric monitoring system, may also be included. This includes all patients entered in the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking - Electrophysiology Cohort (CART-EP) database during the period from 2006-2016, and all VA patients who received a cardiac device procedure during the period from 2010-2019. This includes another approximately 50,000 patients, for a total of 100,000 patients.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
C. difficile infections90 days

Incidence of C. difficile infections

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)7 days

Incidence of AKI

cardiac device infection90 days

Incidence of cardiac device infections

Post-procedure Antimicrobial Use14 days

Proportion of cases with guideline-concordant post-procedure antimicrobial use defined as antibiotics administered for prevention of cardiac device infection (not for pre-existing infection) lasting for greater than 24 hours following the procedure.

Pre-procedure Antimicrobial Use1 day

Proportion of cases with guideline-concordant pre-procedure antimicrobial use defined as appropriate antimicrobials administered within 1 hour prior to incision.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

VA Boston Healthcare System

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath