Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02776358
NCT02776358
Completed
Phase 1

High Fidelity Simulation (HFS) Versus Video-case(VC) Trainings in the Assessement and Management of Severe Asthma Attack Among Medical School Students: a Randomized Controlled Study

University of Monastir1 site in 1 country33 target enrollmentSeptember 2014
ConditionsAsthma

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Asthma
Sponsor
University of Monastir
Enrollment
33
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Difference between the pre and the post-test scores in each group (delta Score)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Bedside clinical case learning, such for respiratory distress, represent a challenge for medical teachers, especially in critical conditions. In fact, this kind of learning implicate the presence of an appropriate case (the patient itself), framework and may be time consuming which could compromise the patient's safety and wellbeing.

New pedagogic tools have emerged to strengthen the medical reasoning and the acquisition of knowledge. in recent years, the development of medical simulation has found a growing interest in the medical teaching field. Contextualization, reproducibility and reliability are the characteristics of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) which guarantee a lifetime experience of clinical conditions without putting at risk patient's safety and comfort.

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of HFS on fifth year medical students learning skills in the assessement and management of an acute asthma attack in the emergency room, and to compares it to other modern teaching tools such as "video-case"

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2014
End Date
May 2015
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Pr. Semir Nouira

Clinical Professor

University of Monastir

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • all fifth year medical students allocated to the one month internship period in the emergency departement.

Exclusion Criteria

  • students refusing to participate in the protocol.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Difference between the pre and the post-test scores in each group (delta Score)

Time Frame: Just before the teaching course (baseline) and one hour later

The difference between the pre and the post-test scores is calculated as follow: delta score = post-test score - pre-test score

Secondary Outcomes

  • Late performance score(7 days after the teaching course)
  • Level of satisfaction(one hour after the teaching course)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials