Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06630962
NCT06630962
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Evaluating the Impact of Financial Navigation on Financial Catastrophe and Distress for Cancer Care: A Randomized Control Trial- COST-FIN

Northwestern University2 sites in 1 country200 target enrollmentJuly 15, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Breast Neoplasm
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Enrollment
200
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Incidence of financial catastrophe (FC)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a structured financial navigation program in reducing financial catastrophe and financial distress for cancer patients in Nigeria.

The main study questions being investigated are:

  1. If a financial navigation program can effectively and significantly reduce financial catastrophe and distress for cancer patients in Nigeria?
  2. If a financial navigation program is financially sustainable and cost-effective for cancer centers in Nigeria?

Participants will be required to:

  1. Complete surveys about their demographics, clinical history, and socioeconomic status
  2. Complete questionnaires about their quality of life and psychological wellbeing
  3. Report all costs related to their cancer care

Investigators will compare participants in the financial navigation program and those not in the financial navigation program to identify potential differences in catastrophic health expenditure and financial distress.

Detailed Description

Over 100,000 individuals are diagnosed with cancer annually in Nigeria, the highest burden out of all countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Treatment options are limited and often delayed due to lack of insurance coverage and high out-of-pocket costs, which is devastating for Nigeria's 83 million living in poverty (40% of the population). Importantly, it is estimated that 77-94% of cancer patients in SSA face financial catastrophe (FC) where health expenses exceed 25% of household expenditure, 40% of non-subsistence expenditures, or 10% of household income. While Nigeria has recently planned to invest 300 billion USD in the National Cancer Control Plan, a comprehensive initiative to centralize and strengthen multidisciplinary cancer care, high-quality research on innovative methods to eliminate cost barriers and make treatment affordable is needed. In the United States, structured financial navigation programs (FNP) have been successful in helping patients finance their cancer care, and save costs, and have been associated with reduced levels of financial distress. However, there is paucity of data high-quality on the effectiveness of an FNP for cancer care in SSA. The proposed study will investigate the effectiveness of an FNP in reducing financial catastrophe and distress for cancer patients in Nigeria. The FNP will hire financial navigators (FNs) at the cancer centers to educate patients on financial literacy, enroll patients in insurance, and find alternative funding sources, such as charitable solutions. The randomized control trial will enroll 200 newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer patients at two cancer centers in Lagos, Nigeria, and investigate the impact of the FNP on: 1. The incidence of financial catastrophe 2. Financial distress 3. Budget and financial sustainability analysis of the FNP -- by conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis by comparing the program's cost to the benefits in terms of funding secured and number of participants enrolled in insurance. This study -- the first of its kind in SSA -- will inform the potential for FNPs to reduce the financial burden of cancer treatment in resource-constrained settings. If effective, programs like this would serve as an invaluable resource to increase access to care and in turn improve cancer outcomes in the region. In light of Nigerian government's recently renewed interest in improving access to cancer care, findings from this study will be crucial in health policy reform. Further, this study's findings will inform and influence cancer care in SSA, and will prompt effectiveness in other similar contexts. Finally, if found to be effective, data from this investigation will lay the foundation to support an R01-level study to comprehensively evaluate the implementation and adoption of FNPs in Nigeria and other parts of SSA.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 15, 2024
End Date
September 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Recently diagnosed with breast, colorectal or prostate cancer within 6 weeks of presentation at the study site
  • Have not received definitive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or undergone major surgery (diagnostic or temporary interventions, such as excisional biopsy or temporary colostomy may still enroll)
  • Candidate for definitive cancer treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to provide consent
  • Has initiated definitive cancer treatment at the study site or elsewhere in the past
  • Only receiving best supportive care

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Incidence of financial catastrophe (FC)

Time Frame: From enrollment to 12 months

To compare the incidence of FC between participants in the financial navigation program (FNP) and control arms. FC is defined as treatment-related costs that exceed 10% of household income (HHI), 25% of total household expenditure (HHE), or 40% of non-essential household spending (HSE). All direct and indirect out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of cancer care will be summed for each participant and represented as a proportion of HHI, HHE, and HSE.

Levels of financial distress (FD)

Time Frame: From enrollment to 3, 6 and 12 months

To compare the levels of FD experienced between participants in the FNP and control arms. Financial Distress (FD) will be measured using the FACIT-COST tool, a validated patient-reported measure with scores ranging from 0-44 (higher scores represent better financial well-being). FACIT-COST scores will be assessed for all participants at 3, 6, and 12 months from enrollment, and mean scores at 6 months will be compared between both study arms.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Rate of cost-related non-adherence(From enrollment to 6 months)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials