Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00426322
NCT00426322
Completed
Not Applicable

Efficacy of Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Large (1-2mm) or Small (0.25-1mm) Bovine Bone Mineral Particles (Bio-Oss®): A Comparative Histomorphometric Clinical Study

Hadassah Medical Organization1 site in 1 country10 target enrollmentMarch 2007
ConditionsSinus Graft

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Sinus Graft
Sponsor
Hadassah Medical Organization
Enrollment
10
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
the relative amount of mineralised tissue (=newly formed bone plus BO)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical study is to compare the amount of newly formed bone after bone augmentation with Bio-Oss® (BO) 0.25-1 mm vs. Bio-Oss® (BO) 1-2 mm in the sinus floor augmentation procedure bilaterally in 8 patients.

Hypothesis:

There is no difference in the relative amount of newly formed bone plus BO between the large (1-2 mm) and small (0.25 - 1 mm) granules.

Detailed Description

the use of bovine bone mineral particles (Bio-Oss®)in sinus floor augmentation is well established. bovine bone mineral is an oseoconductive material which serves as a space maintainer and a scaffold for bone augmentation. the commercial product is manufactured in two different particles sizes, "large"1-2 mm, and "small"0.25-1 mm. Comparison: the histologic characteristics of augmented bone after the use of Bio-Oss® (BO) with particle size of 0.25-1 mm vs. Bio-Oss® (BO)with particle size of 1-2 mm.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2007
End Date
December 2008
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lior Shapira

Head of periodontal department

Hadassah Medical Organization

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The patients included in this study are over 18 year old men and women.
  • The patient must be a candidate for sinus floor augmentation.
  • The patient is able to comply with the study-related procedures such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up procedures.
  • The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women.
  • People who smoke more than 10 cigarettes a day.
  • Alcohol and drug abusers.
  • People suffering from uncontrolled diabetes, severe osteoporosis, rheumatic arthritis, precancer or neoplastic lesions of oral cavity.
  • The patient is nursing.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

the relative amount of mineralised tissue (=newly formed bone plus BO)

Time Frame: 20 monthes

Secondary Outcomes

  • post-operative complications.(20 monthes)
  • Max torque for implant insertion.(20 monthes)
  • short-term implant survival (up to one year post loading)(32 monthes)
  • complications during surgery related to the material.(20 monthes)
  • Relative amount of newly formed bone, graft residues, bone marrow, residual bone and connective tissue.(20 monthes)
  • Clinical parameters:(32 monthes)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials