Pregnant Obese Women and Fetal Ultrasound Quality.
- Conditions
- Obese WomenPregnant Women
- Interventions
- Device: ultrasound propagation velocities, ultrasound fetal quality
- Registration Number
- NCT04212234
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
- Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US) image construction uses equations that contain the value of the propagation velocity of sound waves; this velocity is assumed conventionally to be constant and equal to 1540 m/s in the human body. Since 1977, all manufacturers of US scanners have used this value, which was first established in 1950. In fatty tissue, however, the actual propagation velocity is only in the order of 1450 m/s. US velocity in fat tissue is slower than in other soft tissues (ie:1450 m/s vs 1540 m/s) therefore the intrinsic image quality in terms of sharpness and precision is improved when considering this parameter for image construction The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ultrasound propagation velocity setting on completeness of ultrasound exams and images quality during the second and third trimester fetal ultrasound examination in obese patients.
- Detailed Description
Obese pregnant women will be included before the second trimester fetal ultrasound examination.
Women will be allocated to one intervention group or to the control group. In the intervention group, the ultrasonographer will be able to use several ultrasound propagation velocities to perform the exam.
In the control group, exam will be performed using the conventional ultrasound velocity.
An exam will be considered to be complete if all the images recommended by national guideline are acquired. If ultrasound images are missing, other ultrasound exams may be performed until completeness is reached.
The protocol will be applied for the second and the third fetal ultrasound examination which are recommended by national guideline.
All scans will be evaluated by two independent experts who do not have performed any of the exams. They will evaluate the completeness of each exam. Each scan will be quoted using the quality score proposed by Salomon et al.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 596
- Body mass index>30
- Between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation
- Multiple pregnancy
- Uterine scare
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description free ultrasound propagation velocity ultrasound propagation velocities, ultrasound fetal quality ultrasound exams will be performed using several ultrasound propagation velocities
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method image quality of fetal ultrasound exam second trimester and third trimester ultrasound exam Quality will be assessed by calculating Salomon's score for each image.
completeness of fetal ultrasound exam second trimester and third trimester ultrasound exam completeness will be assessed by the number of the recommended images which could have been registered during the first ultrasound exam in each trimester.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method use of supplementary ultrasound exams in order to assess completeness through study completion, an average of 1 year description of each modality of supplemental ultrasound exam
description of ultrasonographist method in order to improve ultrasound exam through study completion, an average of 1 year description of modality
economic analysis of the intervention through study completion, an average of 1 year cost-effectiveness analysis
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
H么pital Estaing - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
馃嚝馃嚪Clermont-Ferrand, France
H么pital de la Croix Rousse - Hospices Civils de Lyon
馃嚝馃嚪Lyon, France
H么pital Femme M茅re Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon
馃嚝馃嚪Lyon, France
H么pital Arnaud de Villeneuve - CHU de Montpellier
馃嚝馃嚪Montpellier, France
H么pital Cochin - Assistance Publique - H么pitaux de Paris
馃嚝馃嚪Paris, France