CONCEPT: Comparison of Oxaliplatin vs Conventional Methods With Calcium/Magnesium in First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT00129870
- Lead Sponsor
- Sanofi
- Brief Summary
The primary rationale for this study is to develop an optimized schedule of administration of FOLFOX + bevacizumab that maximizes the efficacy and safety of this regimen when administered to patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The hypothesis is that the use of an intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) schedule of FOLFOX/bevacizumab will allow these patients to continue on treatment for a longer period of time by reducing the proportion of patients who discontinue therapy early because of treatment-related toxicities and thus increasing the possibility of a longer time to progression.
The primary objective is:
* To test the hypothesis that an intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) schedule of FOLFOX/bevacizumab will allow patients to remain on therapy for a longer period of time compared to a conventional "treat-to-failure" schedule, by reducing the proportion of patients who discontinue therapy for treatment-related toxicities.
The secondary objectives are:
* To evaluate the impact of calcium/magnesium infusions on the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity in subjects receiving either the IO or conventional FOLFOX/bevacizumab treatment schedules as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
* To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the IO versus the conventional schedule + calcium and magnesium infusions, as part of oxaliplatin-based first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 180
- Histologically or cytologically documented metastatic, measurable adenocarcinoma of the colon, rectum, or appendix with no prior therapies for metastatic disease
- ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1
- Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function as defined by required baseline laboratory parameters
- No other serious concomitant disease.
- Peripheral neuropathy > Grade 1 at baseline
- History of significant cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, or peripheral vascular disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as blood pressure > 150/100 mmHg)
- History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess, within 6 months prior to start of study drug
- Minor surgical procedure, fine needle aspiration, or core biopsy within 7 days prior to start of study drug
- Serious, non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- Active gastroduodenal ulcer
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Significant history of bleeding within 6 months prior to registration
- Prior history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to treatment failure (TTF) for the conventional oxaliplatin (CO) schedule in comparison with the intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) schedule
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The incidence of adverse events, including neurotoxicity, as determined using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) Quality of life, including oxaliplatin-specific neurologic symptoms determined using the PNQoxali Tumor response rate (overall and confirmed) based on application of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Time to tumor progression (TTP) Time of tumor control (TTC) Overall survival (OS) Reasons for treatment discontinuation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sanofi-Aventis
🇺🇸Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States