IRCT20221015056184N1
Recruiting
未知
A comparison of two anesthetic methods with 2% lidocaine for the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: IAN block technique vs local infiltration technique
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Shahed University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients with symmetrical fully impacted lower third molars
Exclusion Criteria
- •patients with systemic disorders
- •drug consuming patients
- •patients taking antianxiety drugs
- •patients with active infection in the wisdom tooth area
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different anesthetic techniques for femur neck fractureFemur Neck fractureJPRN-UMIN000002587Department of anesthesiology, Kitasato Institute Hospital50
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation Forms of Anestesia for Human ReproductioRBR-8kqqxhFaculdade de Medicina do ABC
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
A clinical study to determine the effectiveness of 2% lignocaine with varying concentration of adrenaline used in dental extraction procedures.Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecifiedCTRI/2022/07/044039Self Dr Namrata Patil
Recruiting
Phase 2
Clinical success and pain of two anesthetics methods of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and crestal anesthesia and two anesthetics materials of lidocaine and articaine in the crestal anesthesia for pulpotomy treatment of primary molarsIRCT20171020036896N9Kerman University of Medical Sciences90
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The effect of types of dental anesthesia with lidocaineDental problems.Encounter for screening for other specified diseases and disordersZ13.8IRCT20230301057581N1Tabriz University of Medical Sciences90