Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00311922
NCT00311922
Completed
Not Applicable

Improving Care for Patients With Diabetes and Poor Numeracy Skills

Vanderbilt University1 site in 1 country106 target enrollmentMarch 2006
ConditionsDiabetes

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Diabetes
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Enrollment
106
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
A1C
Status
Completed
Last Updated
18 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this research will be to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a new diabetes educational intervention that teaches self-management skills that compensate for poor numeracy skills among a sample of patients with diabetes and low numeracy.

Detailed Description

Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) suggest that over 90 million adult Americans have poor quantitative skills. Numeracy, the ability to understand and use numbers and math skills in daily life, may be particularly important to patients with diabetes because caring for diabetes often requires self-management skills that rely on the daily application of math skills, such as counting carbohydrates, interpreting blood glucose monitoring, applying sliding scale insulin regimens, and calculating insulin to carbohydrate ratios. Presumably diabetes patients with poor numeracy have more difficulty with self-management and are at risk for poorer clinical outcomes, but to date, there are no published studies that rigorously examine the role of numeracy in diabetes. We have recently completed the initial development of a new scale to measure numeracy in patients with diabetes: the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). The aim of this research will be to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a new diabetes educational intervention that teaches self-management skills that compensate for poor numeracy skills among a sample of patients with diabetes and low numeracy. We hypothesize that a group of patients with poor numeracy who are taught self-management skills that accommodate their poor numeracy will have: (1) improved treatment satisfaction and perceived self-efficacy, (2) improved performance in self-management tasks, and (3) improved glycemic control compared to a control group that receives usual education.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2006
End Date
December 2007
Last Updated
18 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of Type 1 or 2 Diabetes;
  • most recent A1C greater than or equal to 7.0%;
  • Referred to the Diabetes Improvement Program for diabetes care;
  • English Speaking.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with corrected visual Acuity \>20/50 using a Rosenbaum Pocket Vision Screener, or
  • Patients with a diagnosis of significant dementia, psychosis, or blindness.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

A1C

Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patient self-management behaviors(3 and 6 months)
  • Patient knowledge(6 months)
  • Patient satisfaction(6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials