MedPath

Comparative Health Status and Quality of Life of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Who Underwent Matched-sibling Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Non Transplanted SCD Case-control Patients

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Sickle Cell Disease
Interventions
Other: Spermogram
Other: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Other: SF36 Quality of life questionnaire
Other: Psychologist interview
Other: Optional sera banking
Other: Optional DNA banking
Registration Number
NCT06351462
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

The long term burden of morbidity and mortality in the natural history of sickle cell disease has not been compared up to date to the risks and mortality of a curative option like bone marrow transplantation in severe sickle-cell disease patients. Given this lack of data, primary-care Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) physicians and transplant physicians are prevented from a factual debate over the benefit/risk ratio for each patient and refining indications of transplant in patients. Therefore, the present study seeks to describe and compare the very long-term outcomes after either Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) -matched sibling transplantation (study arm) and "non-transplant care" for severe sickle cell disease SCA patients in order to yield robust comparative data regarding both arms.

The main objective is to assess the benefit of Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) regarding quality of life compared to standard care after 10 years, in patients with severe Sickle Cell Disease (SCD).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
220
Inclusion Criteria

Study population (exposed-patients), all criteria should be fulfilled:

  1. Patients alive with Sickle Cell Anemia (SCA, meaning SS and Sbeta0 sickle cell anemia genotype)
  2. Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unit from the 1st of January 2000 and the 31st of December 2012, whatever the age at transplant
  3. Patients having received conditioning regimen containing busulfan 1mg/kg/dose (or equivalent adjusted body-weight dosage according to recommendation) x 16 doses + cyclophosphamide 200mg/kg total dose + anti-thymoglobuline
  4. For patient under 18 years at time of enrolment, signed informed consent from both parental representatives
  5. For patient aged 18 years old : signed informed consent
  6. Having an affiliation to a social security regime

Control-population (Non-exposed patients) :

For each allografted patient, one non-exposed patient will be matched, based on the following criteria:

  • Gender

  • Age at the date of transplantation of the exposed patient (+/- 1 year)

  • Foetal hemoglobin (HbF) level (+/- 3%) before treatment intensification (defined as the initiation of either hydroxyurea or a transfusion program)

  • Hb level (+/- 0,9 g/dl) before treatment intensification

    1. For patient under 18 years at time of enrolment, signed informed consent from both parental representatives
    2. For patient above 18 years of age: signed informed consent
    3. Having an affiliation of to a social security regime
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Study population:

  • Transplantation from donor other than sibling or related cord-blood
  • Conditioning regimen other than busulfan 16mg/kg total dose + cyclophosphamide 200mg/kg total dose + anti-thymoglobuline

For both population:

  • Absence of signed informed consent
  • Having any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness, which preclude understanding of the inform consent as well as optimal treatment and follow-up
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Controlled patients - not transplantedSpermogram-
Controlled patients - not transplantedOptional sera banking-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitSF36 Quality of life questionnaire-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitOptional DNA banking-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitSpermogram-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitPsychologist interview-
Controlled patients - not transplantedPsychologist interview-
Controlled patients - not transplantedOptional DNA banking-
Controlled patients - not transplantedHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-
Controlled patients - not transplantedSF36 Quality of life questionnaire-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-
Patients transplanted from allogeneic HLA-compatible sibling donor or from sibling cord blood unitOptional sera banking-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of quality of life assessed by SF3610 years after HSCT

It will be assessed by the Short-form 36 (SF36) scale. The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of patients with anxiety and depression10 years after HSCT

Anxiety and depression levels will be assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Depression scale : The HAD scale is a self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic.

HADS is a self-administered scale of 14 items which assessed levels of depression and anxiety, divided into 2 subscales of 7 items (Anxiety or HADS-A, Depression or HADS-D). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3. A score is generated for each of the two sub-scales (sum of the 7 items, ranging from 0 to 21). Limit scores, for each of the scores, distinguish: non-cases or asymptomatic ones (score ≤ 7); probable or borderline cases (score 8-10); clearly or clinically symptomatic cases (score ≥ 11)

Evaluation of gonadal function10 years after HSCT

Spermogram in men (proposed not requested), Luteinising Hormone (LH), Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH), estrogen, Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) in women, testosterone in men, Amenorrhea in women.

Evaluation of quality of life10 years after HSCT

Questionnaire including data about employment, education level, social financial support.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath