Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04234178
NCT04234178CompletedNot Applicable

The Effects of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension Techniques on Birth Variables in Labor Analgesia

Ataturk University2 sites in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
First Epidural top-up time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Labor is the process where the cervix is prepared to allow the baby to pass from the uterine cavity to the outside world. In the ordinary course, it ends with spontaneous or instrumental vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Traditionally, the first stage in which the cervix is passively dilated in response to uterine contractions consists of the second stage in which the mother passes the baby through the vagina and the third stage, the exit of the placenta.

In the first stage of labor, pain is caused by uterine contractions and pressure on the cervix. Pain is transmitted through the T10-L2 spinal nerves and is felt in the abdominal wall, waist, hips, or thighs. In the second stage, pain from the vagina and perineum is added to uterine pain. This pain is transmitted by the pudendal nerves through the S2-4 nerve roots.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of dural puncture epidural analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia with epidural volume extension on labor variables.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA I and II parturients
  • Pregnant patients in active labor
  • active labor with cervical dilation < 5cm
  • 37-42 weeks of gestational age
  • Pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who do not want to participate voluntarily in the study
  • Pregnant women outside the age range of 18 - 45
  • Pregnants other than Nullipar
  • Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
  • Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac)
  • Gestational comorbidity (preeclampsia, eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
  • Substance abuse history
  • Chronic pain history
  • Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
  • BMI> 35 kg / m2
  • Failure in neuraxial interventions

Arms & Interventions

Dural puncture epidural

Active Comparator

2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural

Intervention: Epidural (Drug)

Combined spinal-epidural with epidural volume extension

Active Comparator

10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural

Intervention: Intrathecal+Epidural (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

First Epidural top-up time

Time Frame: First 24 hours

Time elapsed between the end of local anesthetic injection and the return of pain \>4 on the NPRS.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Sacral analgesia time(First 24 hours)
  • Performance time(First 24 hours)
  • Incidence of Side Effect(First 24 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Muhammed E Aydin

Principal Investigator

Ataturk University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined... | Clinical Trial