Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04387578
NCT04387578
Completed
Not Applicable

Evaluation of Efficiency for Three Different Aligning Archwires During Initial Orthodontic Leveling: A Prospective Clinical Study

Ahmed Talaat Hussein Ali1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dental Malocclusion
Sponsor
Ahmed Talaat Hussein Ali
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
evaluation of the alignment efficiency
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The present prospective clinical study was directed to evaluate the efficiency of three different aligning archwires during initial orthodontic leveling.

Detailed Description

The present prospective clinical study was directed to evaluate efficiency of three different aligning arch wires during initial orthodontic leveling. The sample of present study included 30 patients, 15 females and 15 males; with a mean age was 17.81 ± 1.96 years. They were randomly allocated into three equal groups, according to the type of the aligning arch wire as follows: 1. Group A: in which 10 patients, with a mean age was 17.27 ± 1.95 years, were treated with conventional singlestrand NiTi arch wires. 2. Group B: in which 10 patients, with a mean age was 17.33 ± 2.42 years, were treated with Niobium-titanium-tantalum-Zirconium (Gummetal) arch wires. 3. Group C: in which 10 patients, with a mean age was 18.70 ± 1.49 years, were treated with multistrand NiTi arch wires. Mandibular orthodontic study models were taken every 4 weeks and laser scanned to obtain 3D digital models during the 3 months observation period of the study. The changes in LII were determined at every 4 weeks observation intervals. Moreover, the changes in inter-canine, inter-1st premolar and inter-molar widths before and after three months were evaluated and compared among the three groups of aligning arch wires. Data were collected and statistically analyzed via Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 23). One Way ANOVA and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to assess the difference among the three studied groups and paired t-test was used to assess the difference and percent of changes within each group before and after three months observation period.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2018
End Date
September 20, 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ahmed Talaat Hussein Ali
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Talaat Hussein Ali

Principal Investigator

Al-Azhar University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe crowding that requires an extraction approach.
  • A blocked-out tooth that prevent the easy placement of the bracket at the initial bonding appointment.
  • Poor oral hygiene or periodontal compromised teeth.
  • Relevant medical history and/or regular medication that contraindicates and/or interferes with orthodontic treatment.
  • Craniofacial anomalies or previous history of trauma, bruxism, or parafunction.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

evaluation of the alignment efficiency

Time Frame: three months of leveling and alignment

evaluation of the alignment efficiency among the three investigated arch wires via the measurement of the scores of Little's Irregularity Index

comparison of the alignment efficiency

Time Frame: three months of leveling and alignment

comparison of the alignment efficiency among the three investigated arch wiresvia the measurement of the scores of Little's Irregularity Index

evaluation of the alignment rate

Time Frame: three months of leveling and alignment

evaluation of the alignment rate among the three investigated arch wiresvia the measurement of the scores of Little's Irregularity Index

comparison of the alignment rate among the three investigated arch wiresvia the measurement of the scores of Little's Irregularity Index

Time Frame: three months of leveling and alignment

comparison of the alignment rate among the three investigated arch wiresvia the measurement of the scores of Little's Irregularity Index

Secondary Outcomes

  • evaluation of the transverse mandibular arch dimensions changes among the three investigated arch wires.(three months of leveling and alignment)
  • comparison of the transverse mandibular arch dimensions changes among the three investigated arch wires.(three months of leveling and alignment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials