MedPath

36-Months Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Room Temperature Resin Composite

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dental Leakage
Interventions
Procedure: Preheating
Registration Number
NCT04679220
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

Summary The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preheating resin composite (RC) on clinical performance of class I restorations in a period of 3-years using a split-mouth double-blinded randomized design.

Detailed Description

The description of the experimental design followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. The present study was a double-blinded (patients and examiner) randomized clinical trial anticipating the split mouth design. Thirty-five adult patients seeking dental treatment in Operative Department clinic at Faculty of Dentistry, University of Mansoura were enrolled in the current study with a total of 70 Class I restorations. No advertisement was made for participant recruitment, forming a sample of convenience. Each patient much sign a consent form before participating in the current study. The study was conducted from October 2017 to June 2020 as a part of Doctoral dissertation. Mansoura University institution's ethics committee approved the form and protocol before conducting the study. The sample size was calculated based on the clinical success rate (100% retention rate at 3 years) of posterior class I restorations restored with nanofilled composite observed in a previous study.28 According to several parameters including a significance level of 5%, the power of the test was calculated to be 80%, and equivalent limit of 15%. Upon these data, a sample size of 30 subjects was appropriate. Allowing for a 20% drop-out, sample size was set totalizing 35 subjects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with primary caries involving occlusal surface only with ICDAS 2 and 3
  • Patients with cavities no more than one-third of the intercuspal distance
  • Patients must have a good oral hygiene;
  • Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester
  • Patients with normal and full occlusion,
  • Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene,
  • Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery,
  • Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis)
  • Patients with abutments should be excluded.
  • Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Non-heated Resin Composite groupPreheatingPatients received Non-heated nanofilled resin composite on one side of the mouth
Preheated Resin Composite groupPreheatingPatients received preheated nanofilled resin composite on the other side of the mouth
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining3 years after restoration procedure

Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using World Dental Federation FDI parameters using a scale from 1 to 5 scores (clinically very good, clinically good, clinically satisfactory, clinically unsatisfactory and clinically poor)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry

🇪🇬

Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath