Comparative study between endoscopic decompression using uniportal/biportal endoscope, conventional decompression, and decompression using tubular retractor in central spinal stenosis (prospective multicenter study)

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Diseases of the musculo-skeletal system and connective tissue

• Registration Number: KCT0004355
• Lead Sponsor: Yonsei University Health System, Gangnam Severance Hospital

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 5 November 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 256

Inclusion Criteria

i. Men or women between the ages of 20-85
ii. Patients with back pain, lower limb pain, neurological intermittent claudication for more than 3 months
iii. Spinal stenosis is observed on the sagittal plane and cross-section of the spinal MRI
iv. There is no response after taking analgesic for more than 1 month
v. In the case of a systemic condition that can withstand surgery by general anesthesia
vi. Health status to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

i. Unclear or suspicious symptoms
ii. Previous urgical histroy on treatment level
iii. Spondylolisthesis abvoe grade II requires surgery
iv. Fracture or dislocation
v. Vertebral body is destroyed or structurally damaged
vi. Vertebral body or disc infection
vii. Vertebral body is damaged by metastatic disease

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional Study
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The degree of muscle damage (CK) was measured and the difference between the four surgical methods was compared and analyzed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The VAS score was assessed at the outpatient visit and evaluated as a successful outcome if the VAS score was reduced by at least 2 points compared with the preoperative level, no adverse event requiring reoperation related to the procedure, no neurological deficit or exacerbation;ODI and SF-36 were measured to observe any improvements in the baseline. In the radiological examinations, disc height narrowing, segmental lordosis, and whole lumbar lordosis were examined.