Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00956683
NCT00956683CompletedNot Applicable

A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulation With Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block for Hand Surgery.

University Health Network, Toronto1 site in 1 country106 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2006Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
106
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block with conventional dual-endpoint nerve stimulator guided infraclavicular block with regards to block success, ease of nerve localization, speed of onset, duration of block and complications.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Current best practice for performance of infraclavicular block dictates the use of a dual-endpoint nerve stimulation technique that still only results in a 79% success rate. Use of an ultrasound-guided technique has the potential to significantly improve success. A randomized, controlled study to evaluate this area remains to be performed and is required to demonstrate to anesthesiologists that an ultrasound-guided approach should supersede nerve stimulation as the technique of choice for infraclavicular block.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery at or below the elbow.
  • •Patients aged >18 and <80 years
  • •ASA I-III

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Inability to read, write or speak English. (This is necessary because subjects will have to follow detailed instructions to allow testing of motor and sensory function. It is not feasible to have an interpreter present in the block room during performance of these procedures)
  • •Contraindication to brachial plexus block
  • •Existing neurological deficit in the area to be blocked
  • •Known loco-regional malignancy or infection
  • •Coagulopathy
  • •Allergy to local anesthetic agents.
  • •Chest or shoulder deformities
  • •Severe respiratory disease
  • •Healed but dislocated clavicle fracture

Arms & Interventions

Ultrasound

Experimental

Ultrasound guided infraclavicular block

Intervention: Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Nerve Block (Procedure)

Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulator

Active Comparator

Nerve stimulator guided dual endpoint infraclavicular block

Intervention: Dual-Endpoint nerve stimulation (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block with conventional dual-endpoint nerve stimulator guided infraclavicular block with regards to block success, ease of nerve localization, speed of onset, duration of block and complications.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials