FFR Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in NSTEMI Patients and Multivessel Disease
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial RevascularizationNSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MIFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPercutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT03562572
- Lead Sponsor
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
- Detailed Description
Background:
Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), as compared with STEMI patients, have a higher risk profile, more often MVD and less favourable outcome. Recent studies showed that complete revascularization in STEMI patients is feasible and effective. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the role of complete coronary revascularization by PCI in patients with non-STEMI with MVD.
Objective:
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Design:
Prospective, multicentre, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study.
Hypothesis:
FFR guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all significant stenosis in the non-culprit lesion performed within the index PCI procedure will improve clinical outcomes compared to the usual care, guided by discretion of the physician.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 476
- Patients aged between 18-85 years presenting with non-STEMI according to current guidelines, who will be treated with PCI of the culprit and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.
- Non-IRA stenosis amenable for PCI treatment (operator's decision)
- Signed informed consent
- Left main disease (stenosis > 50%)
- Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
- Indication for or previous coronary artery bypass grafting
- Uncertain culprit lesion
- Complicated IRA treatment, e.g. extravasation, permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1) and inability to implant a stent
- Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery or TAVI in the follow-up period.
- Killip class III or IV during the completion of culprit lesion treatment.
- Life expectancy of < 1 year.
- Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor or Heparin.
- Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months.
- Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrolment.
- Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The incidence of MACE at 12 months 12 months MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method All-cause mortality or Myocardial infarction at 12, 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months The incidence of MACE in subgroups at 12 and 24 months. 12 and 24 months Prespecified subgroup analyses of primary outcomes will be performed for:
1. Diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients
2. Elderly (≥ 75 years) versus young patients (\< 75 years)
3. Male versus Female gender
4. High versus low risk patients according to GRACE Risk Score
5. Patients previous myocardial infarction versus patients with no previous myocardial infarction
The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score estimates the admission 6 month mortality for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The GRACE score ranges from 0 to \> 285. A higher GRACE represents a higher mortality risk, ranging from 0-2% when the GRACE is between 0 and 87, to 99% when the GRACE exceeds 285.Composite endpoint of Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) defined as composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and major bleeding at 12, 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months Stent thrombosis at 12, 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months Bleeding (major and minor) at 48 hours and 12 months. 48 hours and 12 months Composite endpoint hospitalisation for heart failure and unstable angina pectoris at 12, 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months Any revascularisation at 12, 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months The incidence of MACE at 36 months as well as outcomes of each component of MACE at 12 and 24 and 36 months. 12, 24 and 36 months MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.
Left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 and 24 and 36 month (MIBI scan, MRI or Echocardiography). 12, 24 and 36 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Radboud University Medical Centre
🇳🇱Nijmegen, Netherlands
Brno University Hospital
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
Bacs-Kiskun Teaching Hospital
🇭🇺Kecskemét, Hungary
Szeged University
🇭🇺Szeged, Hungary
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
🇳🇱Den Bosch, Netherlands
Zuyderland MC
🇳🇱Heerlen, Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Centre
🇳🇱Maastricht, Netherlands
Viecuri Medisch Centrum
🇳🇱Venlo, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Centre🇳🇱Nijmegen, Netherlands