Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01805661
NCT01805661CompletedNot Applicable

Assessment of Early Ambulation and Participation in Rehabilitation Program in Patients Receiving Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Ultrasound Guided Posterior Capsular Knee Injection vs Continuous Femoral Nerve Block With Tibial Nerve Block Following Total Knee Replacement.

Trinity Health Of New England2 sites in 1 country56 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2013Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
56
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Ability to ambulate post operatively.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To compare early ambulation and ability to participate in rehabilitation in patients undergoing total knee replacement using two different nerve block techniques for pain control. The 2 methods are 1) Adductor canal block with posterior capsular injection 2) femoral nerve block with tibial nerve block

Detailed Description

Early mobilization in the postoperative period is important to the success of surgery following total knee replacement. However, severe post-operative pain is an impediment to early implementation of rehabilitaion program. The use of femoral nerve block combined with tibial nerve block as part of a multimodal analgesic program provides effective pain control but causes weakness of the operative extremity preventing patients from bearing weight, exercising the leg and increasing the risk of falls thereby delaying early participation in rehabilitation. Adductor canal block is a new technique that has been described to provide pain control after total knee arthroplasty (1). The advantages of this block is that it could potentially minimize lower extremity weakness because the target nerve (saphenous nerve) blocked in this technique is a purely sensory nerve and does not provide any motor innervation to any muscle groups. Adductor canal block lends itself easily to providing prolonged analgesia because a perineural catheter can be inserted and the block maintained by a continuous infusion of dilute local anesthetic solution for days. A disadvantage of this method is that it may not provide adequate analgesia for posterior knee pain in the early postoperative period. By combining adductor canal block with ultrasound guided posterior and antero-medial knee injection, the posterior knee pain can be controlled effectively. Posterior and antero-medial knee injection of local anesthetic solution has been used as a method of controlling posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (2).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Care Provider)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients having primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • ages 18 - 80

Exclusion Criteria

  • history of neurological disease
  • neuropathy
  • major systemic illness
  • pregnancy
  • chronic narcotic use
  • allergy to local anesthetic solution or NSAIDS
  • inability to give consent or cooperate with the study protocol

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ability to ambulate post operatively.

Time Frame: Up to 3 days (72 hours) post surgery.

Ability to ambulate and perform tasks of the rehabilitation program and reach rehabilitation milestones after total knee arthroplasty.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain scores at rest and with knee flexion.(Up to 3 days ( 72 hours) after surgery)
  • Pain Medication Consumption(Up to 3 days (72 hours) post surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor
Trinity Health Of New England
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials