MedPath

Hospital Readmission After HIPr Fracture. Impact of a Territorial Fracture Liason Service

Not Applicable
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Interventions
Other: Fracture Territorial Liaison Service afert a Hip fracture
Registration Number
NCT05266755
Lead Sponsor
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Brief Summary

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the American Society for Bone Research and Mineral Metabolism recommend the creation and implementation of fracture coordination services (FLS) as the most efficient way to address the problem. FLS has emerged as a new clinical approach that uses coordinated, multidisciplinary care to improve post-fracture outcomes and reduce recurrent fractures. It is a multidisciplinary and protocolized care model that must guarantee:

1. Identify fragility fractures and people at risk for a fracture

2. Fracture risk assessment

3. Indication for treatment or referral

4. Improvement in therapeutic compliance

5. Reduce the risk of falls It is known that patients who have undergone a FLS model (vs no FLS), have lower mortality, lower risk of fracture, with a reduction of 35% and 56%, respectively, during two years of follow-up. One of the most important objectives of the FLS is the proper recognition and treatment of osteoporosis (OP) in patients with fragility fractures. A major problem is the lack of adherence to treatment for OP, and inclusion in an FLS program increases the prescription of bisphosphonates from 17.9% to 76%. In addition, a specific follow-up program means that 73% of patients followed by FLS continue to undergo anti-resorptive treatment after 2 years of having suffered a femur fracture.

Detailed Description

Hypothesis After a femur fracture due to fragility, upon discharge from surgery at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, including patients in a regional FLS program will make it possible to complete the study of the patient with fracture, improve adherence to treatment of OP (secondary prevention), and obtain better functional recovery.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • All hip fractures older than 65 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Politraumatic fractures
  • Metastasic fractures

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patiens who will receive stanrdar care after hip fractureFracture Territorial Liaison Service afert a Hip fractureAll the patients who will be on surgery after a hip fracture will receive after the hospital discharge the standar following we are doing now in our hospital
Patiens who will receive FLS following after the hip fractureFracture Territorial Liaison Service afert a Hip fractureAll the patients who will be on surgery after a hip fracture will receive after the hospital discharge a FLS following, multidisciplinary, with a web and mobile app aplication
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of patients with adequated Osteoporotic treatment1 year after discharge

Percentage of patients with adequated osteoporotic treatment

Number of Deaths1 year after discharge

% of Number of deaths after 1st year o follow up

Number of Falls1 year after discharge

Number of Falls 1st year o follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Barthel at the end of follow up1 year after discharge

Compare Barthel after hospital discharge with the end of follow up barthel. Minimum is 0 maximum is 100.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jordi Martin Marcuello

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath