Comparison of 2 supraglottic airway devices in patients undergoing general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/11/037772
- Lead Sponsor
- GOVT MEDICAL COLLEGE BHAVNAGAR
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY
Exclusion Criteria
1) Age: more than 60 Year or less than 18 Year
2) known case of respiratory illness ( like CPOD, asthma, bronchitis etc.)
3) MPG grade 3 & 4
4) patients with mouth opening less than 2 finger width
5) difficult airway
6) inadequate NBM
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Ambu Auragain & Proseal LMA in terms oF Ease of insertion, no. attempts required, sealing pressure, oropharyngeal leak pressurre <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2-4 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare following parameters in 2 groups <br/ ><br> hemodynamic stability of patient <br/ ><br>Ease of insertion of orogastric tube <br/ ><br> to compare complications like <br/ ><br> - Blood Staining after removal <br/ ><br> - sore throat <br/ ><br> - Laryngospasm <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 24hours