Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices air-Q ILA and i –gel for maintaining ventilation under general anaesthesia

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: â—ASA class 1 & 2 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgery in JIPMER of age 18 to 60 year

• Registration Number: CTRI/2015/06/005905
• Lead Sponsor: JIPMER

Brief Summary

**AIMS AND OBJECTIVES**

**Primary aim**

—  To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices

**Secondary  aim**

To compare the following parameters in both devices

- No  of attempts in device insertion & endotracheal intubation

- Ease of insertion of S.G.A

- Device insertion time & ET intubation time

- Device removal time

**Hypothesis:**

**AIR Q is better than I-Gel   in terms of blind intubation  for patients under General anesthesia**

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2013-10-12
• Last Update Posted: 2015-06-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 70

Inclusion Criteria

ASA class 1 & 2 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgery in JIPMER.

Exclusion Criteria

• 1 Any pathology of the neck, upper respiratory tract or upper alimentary tract.
• 2 Predicted difficult airway, 3 A body mass index >35 kg/m2.
• 4 Patients with history of obstructive sleep apnea.
• 5 Patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices	during perioperative period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the following parameters in both devices	No of attempts in device insertion and endotracheal intubation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

JIPMER; 🇮🇳 Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India

JIPMER

🇮🇳Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India

DR SANDEEP MISHRA

Principal investigator

9344668104

jipmermishra@gmail.com