跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2015/06/005905
CTRI/2015/06/005905已完成Unknown

Comparison of air-Q ILA and i –gel supraglottic device in airway management during general anaesthesia – a randomised controlled trial

JIPMER1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2013年10月12日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
已完成
发起方
JIPMER
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices

研究概览

简要总结

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Primary aim

—  To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices

Secondary  aim

To compare the following parameters in both devices

  • No  of attempts in device insertion & endotracheal intubation
  • Ease of insertion of S.G.A
  • Device insertion time & ET intubation time
  • Device removal time

Hypothesis:

AIR Q is better than I-Gel   in terms of blind intubation  for patients under General anesthesia

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA class 1 & 2 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgery in JIPMER.

排除标准

  • 1 Any pathology of the neck, upper respiratory tract or upper alimentary tract.
  • 2 Predicted difficult airway, 3 A body mass index >35 kg/m
  • 4 Patients with history of obstructive sleep apnea.
  • 5 Patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices

时间窗: during perioperative period

次要结局

  • To compare the following parameters in both devices(No of attempts in device insertion and endotracheal intubation)

研究者

发起方
JIPMER
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验