Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping versus Mechanical Cervical Traction on Reducing Neck Pain in Young Female University Students
Phase 2
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Registration Number
- PACTR202307610793616
- Lead Sponsor
- self funded
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
young female university students
aged from 19 to 23 years
with a history of chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP) for at least 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
Participants were excluded if they had clinical recommendation of severe abnormalities or disorders of the cervical spine such as ligamentous injury,
joint dislocation or disruption,
disk prolapse,
cervical stenosis,
referred pain,
recent surgery or fracture in the cervical region,
pregnant women,
allergy to kinesio taping.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie Kinesio Taping's effects on cervical musculoskeletal pain?
How does mechanical cervical traction compare to Kinesio Taping in treating myofascial neck pain in young females?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to cervical traction or Kinesio Taping in musculoskeletal disorders?
What are the potential adverse events associated with Kinesio Taping versus mechanical cervical traction in university students?
What combination therapies show promise for treating cervical musculoskeletal pain alongside Kinesio Taping or traction?